IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] .arpa

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 23 March 2017 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4187129B15 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id psyqDYCoGG0M for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF1A127B60 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vpvnR4MbhzF0f; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:13:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1490292827; bh=1AQja4256WJsBZZ+8r/zjxsnGb7WBqGoDpfbRQn7LTk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=fMuzJbMKy1lKGb/FemBBDVqx3UbW5al47XrnnRmbb3TGdqNIM9xTtQfvEa2hM1aGu zI7MkE3jAwYRncGDg+FRzXHjxovua1X+64sZwgXG3w5Z+SBjzAn1pGQiShNaOZe8E6 Sd7pvpufRUmB7PNcmb9X0loxnvcADoe5xaGgHsRE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gAQs4SpmRxc8; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:13:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:13:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 029C54CA350; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:13:45 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 029C54CA350
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED38C421C500; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:13:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:13:45 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <a6e98737-b426-a67b-efe7-3603c531afcb@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703231412130.2262@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20170323042741.79108.qmail@ary.lan> <2C6B4EB6-D0F0-44A8-95E4-68DF32244639@fugue.com> <20170323163205.GD19105@mx4.yitter.info> <500af1ed-5425-4452-ad8e-c2d511ee738d@bellis.me.uk> <850A8729-8762-4375-90EF-50CDF4AC232E@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703231351490.2262@bofh.nohats.ca> <a6e98737-b426-a67b-efe7-3603c531afcb@bellis.me.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.999 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/m2eknqWewaTBp8-B8BGxsAyVqaU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:13:52 -0000

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, Ray Bellis wrote:

> On 23/03/2017 11:03, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>> The phrase "more important" is pretty meaningless. And as was indicated,
>> it is all based on the levels of DNSSEC deployment on stubs, which could
>> change dramatically if one phone vender would suddently enable
>> validation or default to DNS-over-TLS to 8.8.8.8.
>
> To be fair, if they did _only_ the latter then the .homenet names would
> never resolve anyway...

Correct, and DNS software has to be updated to handle this, just like it
needs updating to handle .local and .onion. If the Powers That Be can
agree on the string, we can start updating DNS software now so we are
ready when 5G hits :P

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email