Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 24 August 2022 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86939C1524B5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mw5Msbg2kDMp for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98618C14F747 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id w19so35572013ejc.7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=dZM1e7WAW+/J0eAu/vu072BDqX/NcIBewJeCaQWlQ94=; b=c1pTSZXvIxWaO1lh3v27gKB5A/sJDDzu+QzvFQcd8EAekh3l+5+lLkfslnFh1MZz2x NeKC8ewOW0CoHgiOg+W/EKyAtw3eue2D5ByFOgEjhYLJSLuE0Fhfafj9UncUR4Vx4Osq K4xikEPFIjTOQm24aFb4dVzknJjt4cZeSAXPw5NOvQUIT5596kOsHwANGxRHRw2XcVIQ a56aQxwc517QrH5wEwJabeMMXKm5S6EFx/7aIOOQjKXthuW3zu/u6AExcfuUU9158hx2 ivkJXJ5kCX2N1sgjEFuB9sqp1cAhmPZt8Osxwd4rv/xBkROyP9IQpMmAx+fKc7x+iZ8e kyJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=dZM1e7WAW+/J0eAu/vu072BDqX/NcIBewJeCaQWlQ94=; b=CqEKsFHnZXcDb6gc62e37DfZeylk4rndCcH8DUJKvOQO/Y3Mo5gY8oF7SDVVGWEwrd 33IGwwGW1EpSwhcN3mG7XeNfO+TVtXXEDPMM32uUSQqbpO4MeDAJViF/WdrOA7lBkm2W 4tHaycHpNmr0z7tH1ZsC68HBTg4kNEuAIzolpfz3IxDOzogi5Y1r3hOXqDX566AHGLPL 74+2HGUo3bvAYyvDyy8p/bFk6Fx4GyzzWmrjV+jSE+4hRyyqBS645H0iQVEVWg5ryiB4 AnBL2AZf9/8EQ6stIKDky964k1DLAtAo0teaoaOzs9akyeeZ1n5sKCt2WTyHpK6bj8a8 7FXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2noN+kenkRdlO4PGT5A7IW0KBeYYHpsaxl/9RFL5eX4BHJGTvr soYgGyUimXT5tmfsbuZD4337zOmTucBIrNtETOAvPA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4XLkOSg11ym0vk+gnXxalzcJTRS8T97L2EUWB1Ew679+HadYndZqbL7VGZjiKSL6lBk6XCsa0cgCFaVRVFmIA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fe0b:b0:730:3646:d177 with SMTP id wy11-20020a170906fe0b00b007303646d177mr308641ejb.688.1661370794013; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BYAPR08MB487262F752C8777A1B9698EFB36B9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <d9e07ea96dd64ea081ba763941a22b17@huawei.com> <6f9c478a2ef745818e3ef3d713218dae@huawei.com> <CAEfhRry4zigpqp3qLzfRmvGvTv-+CygixENWLFaNV7_fKSw49Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMFQQGHVBDFT=tw1C+uUuCgEQMqf0o2_ESR8YeaB2faPKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEfhRrzaQkmkpPCsmN=8A80yq341_YJ8FDYzWf5_Qhttj3wXHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMG87wBUFy4v6fFCLk77Qd69Uyt0YW1dZLAYM+GcoGzwxw@mail.gmail.com> <0FB77649-1C92-41E7-8CB5-C8EE7B051160@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <0FB77649-1C92-41E7-8CB5-C8EE7B051160@pfrc.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:53:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMET4ELv2WrxnCsT_UPWvGjT_79GNsyvHHY=s=UBkKuVJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: Igor Malyushkin <gmalyushkin@gmail.com>, "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" <rainsword.wang=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000004925805e702084b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/HEErujNz-b-RZX0uM5xqurh__Fg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 19:53:19 -0000

Jeff,

Except that during import RDs are rewritten and RTs are not.

If you like to complicate your import and keep tons of run time import
stats for no legitimate reasons no one will stop you, but when it comes to
making IETF to bless it - let's consider all much cleaner and
easier options.

Again - if at all needed ...

Many thx,
R.


On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:49 PM Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> Robert,
>
> On Aug 24, 2022, at 3:23 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>
> In almost all large scale VPN deployments I have seen VPN routes carry
> lots of RTs for various reasons. Allocating one more to determine the src
> VRF is trivial. If at all needed :)
>
>
> Route targets (specifically) are intended to discuss destinations for
> routes, not their sources.
>
> Certainly other extended communities could be used for such a purpose.
>
> Route distinguishers, when configured distinct per VRF in a network,
> already provide that behavior.
>
> -- Jeff
>
>