IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

"gongliyan@chinamobile.com" <gongliyan@chinamobile.com> Tue, 30 August 2022 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B330C14CE31 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I42gpdiO6SPw for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D83C1524DA for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.5]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app11-12011 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eeb630e0f9595f-7c95d; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:24:38 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eeb630e0f9595f-7c95d
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from LAPTOP-C68G8FQH (unknown[10.1.6.52]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee3630e0f94247-3da01; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:24:37 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee3630e0f94247-3da01
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:24:38 +0800
From: "gongliyan@chinamobile.com" <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <BYAPR08MB487262F752C8777A1B9698EFB36B9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.22.188[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2022083021243788907112@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart516558748484_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/pt99q6Rvk1AcCzxkQit7uKiX3wQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:24:45 -0000

Hi Sue and WG,
I support this adoption.  It has provided a detailed solution on the scenarios for VPN routes control in the shared BGP session.

Best Regards,
Liyan
 
From: Susan Hares
Date: 2022-08-16 23:55
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf/
 
The authors believe that they have addressed the concerns raised in 
the previous 2 WG adoption calls.
 
The WG should consider if:
 
1) The revised text answers the previous concerns regarding 
the scope of this draft? 
 
2) Does the revised text provide a useful function for 
networks? 
 
3) Are there any additional concerns regarding the new text? 
 
Each of the authors should send an IPR statement for 
this version of the draft. 
 
The adoption call was moved to 8/29 to 8/30 to allow questions 
to be asked at the IDR interim meeting on 8/29/2022 (10am – 12pm EDT). 
 
Cheers, Sue Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email