IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 29 August 2022 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A90C14F72F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRnTgGHGRdw0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA92EC152588 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20A0B1E31E; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:32:34 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHQinugoGq6sicsgrUZtzkn8c6rqkgnhVoE7Ojb=-wGaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:32:33 -0400
Cc: Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5E77831B-82E3-4797-9697-5C3BB0B71DC5@pfrc.org>
References: <CAOj+MMELVifgg4Yj38kyncDGYzS5fJG-43_kRc7YLwJiTPANUA@mail.gmail.com> <23D1B383-F794-402E-AB1B-D966F8F3375B@tsinghua.org.cn> <CAOj+MMGs9gU=xC0UG4Xaiv5feo2U6VFXkdAxmk6arN_bxe_mSg@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR08MB4872E197715724FC1E853725B3769@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMEY=0iQ=vBGYJ=M=Pd=3gvjZVwWCZC_XPXzXDsD-7_a6A@mail.gmail.com> <2BAFBA3E-0927-48FE-950D-1208EBB2D0F8@pfrc.org> <CAOj+MMHQinugoGq6sicsgrUZtzkn8c6rqkgnhVoE7Ojb=-wGaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/I18ZfpGupHC0urBWYkLIOpw6gGg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:32:57 -0000

Robert,


> On Aug 29, 2022, at 7:45 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> > and instead focus on the technical correctness of the solution.
> 
> Technically the proposed solution in version -03 under adoption is incorrect. 
> 
> If the problem is detected it should be communicated to the src and mitigated at the src not at the mid points. 

Section 4 clearly indicates that notification of the operator is part of the desired procedures.

As previously noted, the source of the issues may not be under administrative control of the network whose PE is issuing the ORF.

> 
> Such communication could be done via mgmt plane or with the assistance of routing protocol. 

That is not the submitted proposal.

Your objections during this adoption call are noted and have become repetitive.  Feel free to comment on the mechanics of the proposal, but otherwise please cease commenting on the problem space.

Thanks.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email