IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 24 August 2022 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071C8C14CF0E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TkOOhezHBqOI for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A3CC152718 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99EDE1E31E; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:49:07 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A0CDC07C-EDE1-45BD-8292-781F497E6B8F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMG87wBUFy4v6fFCLk77Qd69Uyt0YW1dZLAYM+GcoGzwxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:49:06 -0400
Cc: Igor Malyushkin <gmalyushkin@gmail.com>, "Wanghaibo (Rainsword)" <rainsword.wang=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <0FB77649-1C92-41E7-8CB5-C8EE7B051160@pfrc.org>
References: <BYAPR08MB487262F752C8777A1B9698EFB36B9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <d9e07ea96dd64ea081ba763941a22b17@huawei.com> <6f9c478a2ef745818e3ef3d713218dae@huawei.com> <CAEfhRry4zigpqp3qLzfRmvGvTv-+CygixENWLFaNV7_fKSw49Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMFQQGHVBDFT=tw1C+uUuCgEQMqf0o2_ESR8YeaB2faPKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEfhRrzaQkmkpPCsmN=8A80yq341_YJ8FDYzWf5_Qhttj3wXHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMG87wBUFy4v6fFCLk77Qd69Uyt0YW1dZLAYM+GcoGzwxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/wTYMj9n5IMtRkF_JCNHUlA_mSf0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 19:49:37 -0000

Robert,

> On Aug 24, 2022, at 3:23 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> In almost all large scale VPN deployments I have seen VPN routes carry lots of RTs for various reasons. Allocating one more to determine the src VRF is trivial. If at all needed :) 
> 

Route targets (specifically) are intended to discuss destinations for routes, not their sources.

Certainly other extended communities could be used for such a purpose.

Route distinguishers, when configured distinct per VRF in a network, already provide that behavior.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email