IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 23 August 2022 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378B0C1594BB for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wrQ_NZ-3-shy for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68220C1594B6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC7C41E31E; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEQYcKoTqZKK1UpK9O11+Pm5J6Bq16KGUnkDHKtz5=OuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:20:43 -0400
Cc: 王巍 <weiwang94@foxmail.com>, Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BDFC32E1-1C79-4DAD-99E7-6C5086A681F8@pfrc.org>
References: <517EF247-76AF-4981-B33B-8A1707E0103B@tsinghua.org.cn> <CAOj+MMGvBKBL__Pk2AuAYWoiBkMeLW3eZkyp_GD-aXjEtZkJkw@mail.gmail.com> <007b01d8b693$92387190$b6a954b0$@tsinghua.org.cn> <CAOj+MMHmeSUuFy7zKBsDUECje6i-g+9e9qD2=oUkgGdcwL2fpw@mail.gmail.com> <tencent_D185B6FFEBB1CDC5CE17B30965D645B5B40A@qq.com> <CAOj+MMEQYcKoTqZKK1UpK9O11+Pm5J6Bq16KGUnkDHKtz5=OuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/m56VGnul_k3-zRUpFiambB_cWu0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 16:20:46 -0000

Robert,


> On Aug 23, 2022, at 7:49 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> First when BGP max prefix used session should get terminated with a peer. 

That's not their intent.

> 
> Then Max prefix is to be used on eBGP sessions only. 
> 
> Using it on IBGP is dangerous. Not a recommended configuration. 

They're doing this on VPN routes, not iBGP distributed IPv4 unicast routes.

If you have scenarios where you think dropping the VPN routes that would be used in a L3VPN VRF context is harmful, I'm sure the authors would appreciate explicit examples.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email