IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Fri, 19 August 2022 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46764C14CE47 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7Pt6n7dY5R7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (mail-m121145.qiye.163.com [115.236.121.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD47C14CF0A for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by mail-m121145.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 3CD7C800175; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:47:56 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Susan Hares' <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org
References: <BYAPR08MB487262F752C8777A1B9698EFB36B9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR08MB487262F752C8777A1B9698EFB36B9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:47:55 +0800
Message-ID: <004301d8b365$51ecc590$f5c650b0$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01D8B3A8.60129DA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFUJS7lrxKMUf8leRH1e5ALeidwIK6+fWeA
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkZGElCVk9ISkgfSR8aHR1LQlUTARMWGhIXJB QOD1lXWRgSC1lBWUlKQlVKT0lVTUJVTE5ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWUFZT0tIVUpKS0hKTFVLWQY+
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6Mhg6PDo5Dj0xPxc4FwkSSgI* LEMwFE5VSlVKTU1LQ0xLS0xNTEtOVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQUpLS0hDNwY+
X-HM-Tid: 0a82b392279eb03akuuu3cd7c800175
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yMrrLg9kzMHsOmMRGS2FBtwauNo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:48:01 -0000

Hi, Sue:

 

I support for its forwarding and think the update contents have addressed
the comments raised on the list.

The proposed mechanism can enhance the VPN prefixes control within the
operator's network in more precise manner, and ease the deployment of
various VPN services in their networks.

 

I am unware of other undisclosed IPR for this draft.

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

From: idr-bounces@ietf.org <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 11:56 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for
draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

 

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for
draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf/

 

The authors believe that they have addressed the concerns raised in 

the previous 2 WG adoption calls.

 

The WG should consider if:

 

1) The revised text answers the previous concerns regarding 

the scope of this draft? 

 

2) Does the revised text provide a useful function for 

networks? 

 

3) Are there any additional concerns regarding the new text? 

 

Each of the authors should send an IPR statement for 

this version of the draft. 

 

The adoption call was moved to 8/29 to 8/30 to allow questions 

to be asked at the IDR interim meeting on 8/29/2022 (10am - 12pm EDT). 

 

Cheers, Sue Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email