IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 29 August 2022 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63BC1526E5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 17:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OONcJgCvlf8I for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 17:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C56FC14F748 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 17:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC1151E31E; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:45:04 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_666232B7-797B-4C64-B0B6-D7DD05A1BD5A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMF73rMar0tmzPfWfj357KnGxgv99HnNxjvBmdFoagyNag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 20:45:04 -0400
Cc: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Message-Id: <3C557A84-BED3-4EF4-9484-EE2D0D08ADDF@pfrc.org>
References: <CAEfhRrw803Vhhag_w0hqvdJ6p_6j3VeR=9RDqZL1gj8oYCOdRA@mail.gmail.com> <11047334-C4DB-4336-BF4C-3BCBFBA7532E@tsinghua.org.cn> <CAOj+MMF73rMar0tmzPfWfj357KnGxgv99HnNxjvBmdFoagyNag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xi1RUzWs46B_YV7ITq2ILGbmu7Y>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:45:09 -0000

[Speaking as an individual contributor.]

Robert,

Two targeted comments.

> On Aug 28, 2022, at 6:59 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> > It may come from the CE that where the PE-CE limit is not set
> 
> Then set it. 

It may not be under administrative control of the receiving device.  That case has been repeatedly emphasized throughout this discussion.

> > we can discuss how to propagate it further. 
> 
> Yes I just told Jeff that you have not given up on making this transitive :) Now you have confirmed it. Thank you !

An ORF is fine.

But I've also mentioned that the "directionality" matter is highly problematic to solve for the transitivity case.  I have strong doubts it has a good solution.

-- Jeff (but I'm willing to hear the technical arguments that it could be)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email