Re: risk zones

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2969D3A0920 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:24:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrwjj9_YPWJU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814C33A0919 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 07:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 026FOQDp048931 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:24:26 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 9499820437C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:24:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A39B2041E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:24:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 026FOQrK009194 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:24:26 +0100
Subject: Re: risk zones
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <158344386661.14598.13307571424986389922@ietfa.amsl.com> <4295F611-DDB6-4BCB-AFF3-B7F313C6C9A6@sobco.com> <19D579B6-E81E-47BE-9881-6DFA3D5173D1@ietf.org> <1866d5b0-4c83-9c9d-4a17-55153024a872@gmail.com> <c94c6ecc-598f-c1c5-f14a-7105031671d0@gmail.com> <CAAuWHC+2zPLUUhhsCfHBowJchjU6fqFtugkmepbN6+MrrcKrRw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwj2HHXPUHYv7wKDXwfzvHJsQg9wtoJqnWYZEfdutELRVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7f88e02b-5286-3156-4abb-5ed3caabb08f@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:24:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwj2HHXPUHYv7wKDXwfzvHJsQg9wtoJqnWYZEfdutELRVA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/06x_wXrKuGrUFznZH5swkhupY14>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 15:24:31 -0000

Well, no ad hominem.

For data points: new cases in China downed cca. 500-100 in recent month 
but up 100-130 in recent days.  It's hard to predict.

Alex

Le 06/03/2020 à 15:58, Phillip Hallam-Baker a écrit :
> I just watched an idiot government spokesperson try to tell us the 
> problem is declining because new cases are 'down in China'.
> 
> Yes, of course they are down in China, the government put the country on 
> a war footing and shut it down. There are pictures of workmen welding 
> shut the doors on apartment buildings. The lockdown is almost total, of 
> course the spread of infection has declined there.
> 
> That has absolutely no effect on the spread in the West where we have 
> taken none of those measures. We haven't even shut down large public 
> meetings like sports events and concerts yet. And don't expect that to 
> be happening in countries where the first priority of the dear leader is 
> to hold large public rallies to boost their egos
> 
> There is a huge amount of happy talk based on nonsense right now. A half 
> dozen companies have announced vaccines. But making a vaccine is really 
> easy, all you do is scoop out a bit of the virus. The hard part, the 
> really hard part is working out if the bit of the virus you scooped out 
> is the right bit to provide protection. Most times it doesn't actually 
> have any effect at all. Sometimes it makes people more likely to be 
> infected and sometimes it kills the test subjects. So you have to test 
> and that takes time.
> 
> The way that authoritarian regimes react to crisis is very predictable. 
> First they deny that there is any problem at all. Then they minimize the 
> problem and then they panic and over-react. China followed that exact 
> pattern.
> 
> The West currently has a large number of aspiring authoritarian leaders 
> but few actual authoritarian regimes. So we are stuck in stage two and 
> will remain stuck there for a considerable time..
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:50 AM Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@xalgorithms.org 
> <mailto:jpotvin@xalgorithms.org>> wrote:
> 
>     RE: The communication coming from up to down is changing daily.
> 
>     A pragmatic view of uncertainty:
>     https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/download/Working+Groups+%26+Incubator+Projects/flow-syllabus/The+General+Direction+of+FLOW/The+Methodological+Significance+of+Uncertainty/WebHome/uncertainty_visualize_medium.png
> 
>     Joseph Potvin
>