Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Fri, 06 March 2020 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E342B3A0F80; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:39:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VEC2VGHBSIt; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.10.11] (115-189-132-40.mobile.spark.co.nz [115.189.132.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16AB33A0F7E; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-71A770F0-2B97-421E-8C64-B3090884828F"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:39:44 +1300
Message-Id: <10F5BF36-4639-46C7-B952-2AAE36EFB298@ietf.org>
References: <170ad423be0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, 107all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <170ad423be0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/aLyvwcqbwPrDGDJfbqF375aW7S0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:39:53 -0000

Lou


> On 6/03/2020, at 1:33 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Jay,
> 
> two very different points here:
> 
> 1) Everyone's situation is different / unique and often more complicated than simply who is canceling. I  strongly urge you, the LLC and the iesg to have a single consistent, and public, refund policy for all.  (Either full refund for all or service charge for all).
> 
I’m comfortable that our current policy strikes the right balance between an individual policy for each individual circumstance and a one-size-fits-all policy. 

> 2) have you checked on the legal exposure to the organization of continuing to hold the meeting in the face of so many public cancellations -  which are taking place at the organizational level (e.g., f8), the association level (IEEE, apc) and at the national level (CN and IS)?
> 
Yes. 

Jay
-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director

> Thanks,
> Lou
> 
>> On March 5, 2020 6:58:28 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 6/03/2020, at 12:50 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The difference should not be between corporate and government travel restrictions but between self-inflicted (company halts travel, company pays) and externally imposed (individual pays, employer still forbids travel; company pays, government forbids travel).
>> 
>> I agree.
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>>> 
>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jay Daley
>> IETF Executive Director
>> jay@ietf.org
>> +64 21 678840
>>