Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3848B3A0F8A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 05:40:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b5yDBS_zcg0v for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 05:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-f175.google.com (mail-oi1-f175.google.com [209.85.167.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 056DE3A0F86 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 05:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-f175.google.com with SMTP id l12so2527178oil.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 05:40:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kLQynPhj/IfeRxvSH5QDjOM4jXAiuqSVy2ASBHyxpQs=; b=bjYaanIXnGyD3Lt4elSeNgTXCoYV6vwyvoHtxelMTiW3N7nwHTwUKe7Mw117KNorDC 7LQLhAG/zZCy4bf6Rz9PXdMxABxeggDoZrXLUn6UKLZ1Jfh2x1MuZdc+R0fIsUsM/Frq s8Z65xAk9hPJRVMcpUMJa7UYJJisa26kaXXRiB+ShGm2jVIxznP8W+rHY74EZ5l2oTmo QKqsZ3z0hCFdB0StO4jfTTn7ZI1W8fe/1TmTraOfLmzhPNaY4SKU4PdrZR9rVMC4hQN5 IV5eC/FdP+ywLXUV1cIaC7ehi9SpSefn4Sf2l0wOWmOeJ9G83uKHa8veLFUERlm5SoK4 7LkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ31SsrGSDiuMWa2CBvenz1Be1q8iwaieLtLFCf9h/Ie2pCK5Eb3 /2A+53qIJYHkcOhKEaRdmW+tsSDDZu93/vrfDX1n+4w4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtow5QWfTQY3z9+BvzDq7U5B4lCccURBFXY9iuk22To13vA+8t/YaQ2dKiXLPpwaieP2fCr+INfHNVwoTyveI0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:45:: with SMTP id v5mr2512360oic.90.1583502033280; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 05:40:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158344386661.14598.13307571424986389922@ietfa.amsl.com> <4295F611-DDB6-4BCB-AFF3-B7F313C6C9A6@sobco.com> <19D579B6-E81E-47BE-9881-6DFA3D5173D1@ietf.org> <5B5288DF-2E4E-417B-94A7-B0E7A89FB9B5@sobco.com> <m2h7z2l9el.wl-randy@psg.com> <7D0FB428-7402-42AC-9A5F-13509254C607@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <7D0FB428-7402-42AC-9A5F-13509254C607@cooperw.in>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 08:40:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwi4D9z4afkM3iZHShyPTuYScdW1yeg2X3-D60r6hEZ6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000031e3b205a02fccb8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MsvStBsBbUsngcQqPsb8dJCb95o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 13:40:35 -0000

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:30 PM Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

> One thing that becomes obvious while serving in the IETF leadership is
> that no-win situations are unavoidable. If you try to make decisions based
> on objective criteria and take your time to gather data, you get
> criticized. If you try to make decisions based on anecdotal evidence or
> take what seems to be the path of least resistance, you get criticized. If
> you follow the advice of one group of participants, you get criticized by a
> different group that disagrees. It can seem like an endless, thankless
> torrent of messages telling you that no matter what you do, it’s wrong and
> it isn’t good enough.
>
> So I’d like to say thank you to everyone on the IESG, Colin, Jay, Greg,
> the team at AMS, and the WG and RG chairs for all they’ve done thus far to
> help manage the IETF 107 meeting planning in light of COVID-19. Your work
> is appreciated.
>
> Alissa
>

Quite, this is not a decision you should be taking. It is a decision the
government should have taken. Cancelling IETF is not going to have a
significant impact on the spread of COVID, it only makes sense if there is
government leadership and we don't have that.

China did the math: 2% of 1 billion people is 20 million. If this thing
takes hold, it is going to kill more people than WWII.

At the moment everyone is focused on Vancouver. But we are almost certain
to see most sporting events including the Olympics cancelled and at least
one of the US political conventions. I would start looking at contingency
plans for the case we are told that 108 and 109 are cancelled by government
order.

The impact of government travel restrictions is going to be significant.
But that is not going to be the only effect of this crisis. There is going
to be a desperate need for technology that allows people to communicate and
work remotely. And we are the people who are supposed to provide the open,
interoperable solutions.

Skype, Zoom, WebEx, Keybase, Signal etc. are all fine for collaboration
inside enterprises. But none of them is a replacement for email or the
telephone because none of them can talk to each other. We need a federated,
open solution. And the IETF is the place people are going to be looking to
develop that.