Re: on "positive" organizational culture

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 07 March 2020 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42E73A0EE9; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:57:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dpFl0uhfT_tq; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152463A0EE8; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:57:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.108.222]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 0270vF7s019774 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:57:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1583542651; x=1583629051; i=@elandsys.com; bh=+Fj3nTw6tY4urfNzpVaGy468noz836XEDoNti9Ij5iA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=vp8EJCKxI29hZtFdm+A48ONVMYQOyfEZLlBG/b+pGq3/8+jAkT4Qeaaydt7b47y41 3UiDFNnlTJZqND4XPmDmjhjEfJUn4fjSxzC+CErQvnY3ArxANLTi7dFPUZqJvCu1sG iZb87hs6v06CispGljpELWoAur2KywMjisKQ93L4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200306161800.13fde6b8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:56:09 -0800
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: on "positive" organizational culture
In-Reply-To: <0DAAE6A4-9F3F-4F2F-9DF5-723D15EE9AB3@ietf.org>
References: <7a0c887d-d259-3a75-b6a5-c33a62ee8d5d@network-heretics.com> <0DAAE6A4-9F3F-4F2F-9DF5-723D15EE9AB3@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/EAZEHkMeUnAKUPQE2ReMXt_1-GM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 00:57:37 -0000

Hello,
At 02:06 PM 06-03-2020, Jay Daley wrote:
> > On 7/03/2020, at 10:27 AM, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> >
> > I want to state at the outset that this message is about 
> organizational culture in general and not about anyone in 
> particular in the past or present.
>
>Thanks. I found this very helpful.

Yes.

>I don't agree that is inevitable. There are plenty of people out 
>there, both in leadership positions and not, who have a strong moral 
>compass or some other strong personal limiter and so will not 
>bend.  That is not to say that I think safeguards should not be in 
>place to prevent this - they should.
>
>The behaviour of leadership, while important, is not the sole issue 
>- it is the behaviour of *all* of us that is important as we are all 
>important in this community. Overly focusing  on leadership ignores 
>the power of individual community members to set the culture of the 
>organisation.

The position(s) taken "at the top" provides an impetus.  There are 
other factors.  For example is there a culture of accountability 
within the organization?

The power of the individual depends on the rights of the 
individual.  Using the word "positive" may be viewed as another way 
of recommending against exercising those rights.  At the end of the 
day it is about institutional trust.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy