Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EC33A1041; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:29:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCUeQLHXm7kR; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:29:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 916033A103E; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:29:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id e13so624826qts.6; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:29:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=eMG0tOd84iiVP8dLht4wT2ffnZM7rCdJJigtNKCXwCo=; b=coWjJp41Hto/O4m+PLjTlO9/zvSnPNL6/PkoihkWfNIrKj/0KWjFzr0WlcrsKKzM7Y T0wJ0Cld4wUvBSVLUusy7LEk7vdg3BKTlSbqVY1/7z5gr/rf6J+semM/fbiRpLAl+Jtl nuoDfOozxdgl3HpEdbGndQGM3HfAhsxy5AyEzJXP1JKE83tirVUAoQzX/SabpWNMaW5g do8eXr/P5ogujkHYiIo0LexpLhqa8ibM4tQh9dmWJE/Mftby/uwgIG1HYChvvG3vUVtf pi7A0l3nq/pYGAyh8BvbwmPdGT8p0F6G1+rm0DJanvGDxHI2ny2EteTnClLcP+zloncr Rpdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=eMG0tOd84iiVP8dLht4wT2ffnZM7rCdJJigtNKCXwCo=; b=uIVEfvOkGROyhjZXcHIf4vpRyHT/U6sEb1eCyR8wYh968Mc5b3ih6nSoOj5E/mN1GA wr7UfN5OiFh9+/qnm0hM9suJELMdaNf0C2LuZPK9qW2LrVJyrtZZaGmgAeatT0IHla53 4wr3qtqJgP6sGi6NI+dar2oAzm/JOej46MwoabeYQ3gqPPN28RIaS3TQDnM2BfjieDlJ 3WIpe9VORWXz8puA33J+qRuc2+2Iudco+Iaw5Yf/E8IhTNmrvqj4NM9WJT+bf0n6I4jt /d9oFpKWm6nC4SAnCXW5mZixRyqEaEi3NdAcbaMYs6RJWH8jlV9xU7NL6r9f/PPMmMdc tc6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1I3uzuWwhKhwQEjMQ2hr1kjmUQxkOPsxamwZh0PbMPa+ER8b0Y ALYOmfdM83V50ievjErNZ0Qqx2sSFN8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtIk5cKVuBj/F40pinzNLxSaEE9dEUJ8OGgXSvNv1fI3RSlvin1oBpo8uCCLxBKHQIcDzJFzw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3798:: with SMTP id d24mr962679qtc.178.1583458160483; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (146-115-73-78.s5196.c3-0.arl-cbr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcncustomer.com. [146.115.73.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d129sm16774605qkc.74.2020.03.05.17.29.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-9BB4AF6F-8945-4722-8DC2-F8B86B2B9927"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 20:29:18 -0500
Message-Id: <1876E171-8AE5-4BE3-910D-0055E4790088@gmail.com>
References: <DCDA91A2-8CE1-4655-B6CD-B1C3CE3A2D59@ietf.org>
Cc: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, 107all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DCDA91A2-8CE1-4655-B6CD-B1C3CE3A2D59@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SAqvE3kQN5J7DlsJRN3Iw9wYwOk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 01:29:24 -0000

Jay,

Has the decision factored in the impact if people are put in quarantine out of their control when traveling?

Did the decision factor in the opportunity to test out all remote?  It’s getting late for that, but with more time this could have been interesting and informative for future meetings.

I am not attending per company policy.

Best regards,
Kathleen 

Sent from my mobile device

> On Mar 5, 2020, at 8:10 PM, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Lou
> 
>>> On 6/03/2020, at 1:46 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>> ----------
>> On March 5, 2020 7:40:22 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > Lou
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 6/03/2020, at 1:33 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Jay,
>> >> 
>> >> two very different points here:
>> >> 
>> >> 1) Everyone's situation is different / unique and often more complicated than simply who is canceling. I  strongly urge you, the LLC and the iesg to have a single consistent, and public, refund policy for all.  (Either full refund for all or service charge for all).
>> >> 
>> > I’m comfortable that our current policy strikes the right balance between an individual policy for each individual circumstance and a one-size-fits-all policy. 
>> >
>> 
>> Can formally State / post what the policy is?. I think I heard if canceling due to the corporate policy, no refund. if individual is canceling and paying out of pocket or due to CA government action, full refund.
>> 
>> what about cancellation due to health issues?
>> 
> The special registration provisions are here https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/107/ietf107-special-registration-provisions/
> 
> If anyone has a special circumstance which is not covered but they believe it should be then they should let us know at ietf-registrar@ietf.org. If your next question is why don’t we publish that, then the answer is because people who are actually in that position do get in touch. 
> 
> Jay
> 
> -- 
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> 
>> 
>> >> 2) have you checked on the legal exposure to the organization of continuing to hold the meeting in the face of so many public cancellations -  which are taking place at the organizational level (e.g., f8), the association level (IEEE, apc) and at the national level (CN and IS)?
>> >> 
>> > Yes.
>> 
>> Very happy to hear that.
>> 
>> Thank you
>> Lou
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> > Jay
>> > -- 
>> > Jay Daley
>> > IETF Executive Director
>> >
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Lou
>> >> 
>> >>> On March 5, 2020 6:58:28 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>>> On 6/03/2020, at 12:50 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> The difference should not be between corporate and government travel restrictions but between self-inflicted (company halts travel, company pays) and externally imposed (individual pays, employer still forbids travel; company pays, government forbids travel).
>> >>> 
>> >>> I agree.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Jay
>> >>> 
>> >>>> 
>> >>>> Grüße, Carsten
>> >>>> 
>> >>> 
>> >>> -- 
>> >>> Jay Daley
>> >>> IETF Executive Director
>> >>> jay@ietf.org
>> >>> +64 21 678840
>> >>>