Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 06 March 2020 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4201E3A1057 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:39:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RW6A55txnzWc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1670E3A1055 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:39:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1jA1xv-0000Yo-G1; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 01:39:51 +0000
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:39:51 -0800
Message-ID: <m2y2sejm6w.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching
In-Reply-To: <7D0FB428-7402-42AC-9A5F-13509254C607@cooperw.in>
References: <158344386661.14598.13307571424986389922@ietfa.amsl.com> <4295F611-DDB6-4BCB-AFF3-B7F313C6C9A6@sobco.com> <19D579B6-E81E-47BE-9881-6DFA3D5173D1@ietf.org> <5B5288DF-2E4E-417B-94A7-B0E7A89FB9B5@sobco.com> <m2h7z2l9el.wl-randy@psg.com> <7D0FB428-7402-42AC-9A5F-13509254C607@cooperw.in>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/B364KlfUfZH1HDDWX92v5LfvVcc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 01:39:54 -0000

> One thing that becomes obvious while serving in the IETF leadership is
> that no-win situations are unavoidable. If you try to make decisions
> based on objective criteria and take your time to gather data, you get
> criticized.  If you try to make decisions based on anecdotal evidence
> or take what seems to be the path of least resistance, you get
> criticized.  If you follow the advice of one group of participants,
> you get criticized by a different group that disagrees. It can seem
> like an endless, thankless torrent of messages telling you that no
> matter what you do, it’s wrong and it isn’t good enough.

i hope and presume you are not surprised by this.  it is just part of
life in leadership roles.  [ not so much in management roles, where
blame shifting and avoidance of black marks plays a large role. ] which
is why one does one's best to do what one perceives as the right thing,
motivate it well, and then get on with life and the inevitable next
pile.

randy