IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 06 March 2020 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104A23A0F6F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:33:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Ja1uY6ErxlK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.33.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2ED73A0F67 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 16:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw15.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.15]) by gproxy8.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104241AB02D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:33:11 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id A0vOjGNLG1as5A0vOjHfxT; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:33:11 -0700
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ScTZiMZu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=SS2py6AdgQ4A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=gKmFwSsBAAAA:8 a=abwqm-zPECvp7gLHmY0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=DAIhgCzSaVUgej7SMtgA:9 a=LYyRu7aZIRe52trC:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10:nop_html a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=nnPW6aIcBuj1ljLj_o6Q:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7EkvM7kO+4A2TWzpPNAmtOEE3Wo7fyJtxsjBUpOWmEM=; b=e0OMou6BJGs3VeIT4YFx8ZD37k eZ8mnjUMTEeD54fzHB7fDRrCanL3BfLndPfjRrJ3IAwOM66n7xE/835vRpO9DKl+jF7TE2QXCMdXq tFgIPOJGpkxJdYQpQfnG14Udr;
Received: from pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.11.201]:38688 helo=[11.5.0.140]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1jA0vO-002P8y-Kg; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:33:10 -0700
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, 107all@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 19:33:08 -0500
Message-ID: <170ad423be0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <09A1A713-3C6D-4DC2-8A69-999FE76806F6@ietf.org>
References: <158344386661.14598.13307571424986389922@ietfa.amsl.com> <4295F611-DDB6-4BCB-AFF3-B7F313C6C9A6@sobco.com> <19D579B6-E81E-47BE-9881-6DFA3D5173D1@ietf.org> <5B5288DF-2E4E-417B-94A7-B0E7A89FB9B5@sobco.com> <C5159B8D-46A0-44FF-B5C1-15CA524B8ED2@me.com> <CF47024C-EC16-4503-99B5-997CD4D13B66@ietf.org> <913D117B-731D-4C5A-8A5F-0949E6E7D3AD@tzi.org> <09A1A713-3C6D-4DC2-8A69-999FE76806F6@ietf.org>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.22.0-1511 (build: 102200004)
Subject: Re: IETF 107 Standard Registration and Internet Draft Deadline Approaching
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------170ad429bc72558277b3034fa0"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 72.66.11.201
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1jA0vO-002P8y-Kg
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.5.0.140]) [72.66.11.201]:38688
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sMTkc4IEHcKErzLXkI1F-LrTwSo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:33:19 -0000

Jay,

 two very different points here:

1) Everyone's situation is different / unique and often more complicated 
than simply who is canceling. I  strongly urge you, the LLC and the iesg to 
have a single consistent, and public, refund policy for all.  (Either full 
refund for all or service charge for all).

2) have you checked on the legal exposure to the organization of continuing 
to hold the meeting in the face of so many public cancellations -  which 
are taking place at the organizational level (e.g., f8), the association 
level (IEEE, apc) and at the national level (CN and IS)?

Thanks,
Lou



----------
On March 5, 2020 6:58:28 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
>> On 6/03/2020, at 12:50 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> 
>> The difference should not be between corporate and government travel 
>> restrictions but between self-inflicted (company halts travel, company 
>> pays) and externally imposed (individual pays, employer still forbids 
>> travel; company pays, government forbids travel).
>
> I agree.
>
> Jay
>
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>
> -- 
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> jay@ietf.org
> +64 21 678840
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email