IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: BCP97bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 18 October 2021 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2ADE3A1827 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1BWqqqY20MRe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 315BF3A1821 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id e2so5452951uax.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wac44M/MnAqnFsh1wd2sOpdsvU1b9mEEh1uN26kwsaM=; b=ANn1fmFOci8n3Fi8wXb4c2u7SLXESP4B/dBXR8Ged/8nKlaUY3i/9DcoQf6eW0M87W xc3QfrGOJG1oMxSRRpkQouvAvp9LmpmXBjHubl/zbj78ib7Ec5Lk6kkuW6iVTu5nwC9M KGrOI8Un5s3K6HGU+6BE5wwg0n5iZTjq39B+4mrLcwTj/d00nUziwA2yRSRyBZkUEBK+ 2bNEJUULH3L11bEVGQZb9OTSa8xjjMm0AQ4qCKPLKZo55G3awIgqs9GSpV1sIq1lII08 592SudRq9Rs7h4GeIATh30wiBwNS/yCC0U2NqmSFCNweW0f4TfDBByIeHhdID9iIS3Yx Hdew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wac44M/MnAqnFsh1wd2sOpdsvU1b9mEEh1uN26kwsaM=; b=CCp3BKGaC8JfV6ChP7TJECLibGiE3B2tLKhiXquFZK05ISF9I/xSUsaUFSw6bnM+3K hc996G6/jeZDaCkoXt53dNb3QGodid2S2Uj87B9dYwxyUOA4qoSnIuSadOSUQQpHKdAz 6KozA+KI7GmHFupX4iMsUlTuh6jmHXATherwK+j2djZuLDVG6FUcYSvTsJTicMbJnsfg nvUU7EXZOdsfXLJg/aV7c/c4acqOXk8es9NMU+GkHZX7mEHlp+UUFnX69Cv1TQNCuFuO sgLQtK74pFxFg5vC9+YXEmHoLQKNJ6CGo/q1Y7QMerFJhcp96kAducskymvLXPhT7xYs v2PA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lSYMdYotoNCQOspUFKc1nT2Pg6N46FjcpfZO22bx1Ygu47G9p lBLiIOQRe1+AN5x5jVhh7h9S/tWL2LVJ9Y1C7nw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4q3CGRYxtg51H3k6DMN+XQDm1Tq3IM7UDmLHP45lcy5jCgzdcxOzUlIaHqrkVAce7qXvRCzrUkgBBKnhr1Ic=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7419:: with SMTP id r25mr27304344uap.67.1634580065950; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwa4ChOsuMkmoP_sAGv3Wn2AcSz1OkijmxZzP+MGvnwviA@mail.gmail.com> <849D7F9E-8AD4-4CE8-A66C-358FB1F2E6AE@tzi.org> <3AC61568-DBDC-4ADB-9935-9C53333AE7E2@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZvCq7R=WBFsrwf51CKSN8ur0Yj-F=VOHnP=hQD0ooj-A@mail.gmail.com> <890A4965-D847-4606-849C-A0C8D8FD3B0C@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZtBiuh5n3U_pKma1s4ymPOCy7CY0pFaaacx6NDYNu5AQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iKkm1C2BwTfSu35WQbzNYSvBAGJiDVh6kh7zYDjp4rofw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKkm1C2BwTfSu35WQbzNYSvBAGJiDVh6kh7zYDjp4rofw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 11:00:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZasyxM++xa7kRm8+GWbjxXC+YGLMVLbxwu_925uCGa7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000030211805cea45441"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RYZWdGQgjXKVH-tSyDSCzCi-rTo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:01:15 -0000

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:40 AM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> Yes, in an ideal world, this would be an open, free, etc document -- but,
> absent an ideal world, I still think that it's better that how IPv6 is
> transmitted over NFC using 6LoWPAN is documented in an RFC than having an
> undocumented protocol...
>

I agree, but we're not talking here about making that a hard requirement.
We just need to ensure meaningful reviews are possible when that's not the
case.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email