IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: BCP97bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 18 October 2021 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327BD3A16E9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wyrRHuf2QrOL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958013A16E5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id e2so5301369uax.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nvv/uuf7iTKt5tREn4dpg3HuduBgDtv8cepjZZGCvlI=; b=oOQOKAxvwfOC98qliGTvUQE7S1t89a3fQcnqs7yhdm0vM9rLoByAqpngt6FqzcAff7 Y2rg6pCdLVzzki+JLfYTEYj5pqyPJi+N5BrLjaGPgHe4mPjAnOnCvCQ7PVC+qwCOHvlv 8yp34jgnRSfeH7bF4dHrFw5xxt1uGgTM3mumIcKJi5wwp3jLhMF9LlWAg2uLBDlHbCqA xmEraqiWBAFBksDhMoEiGIWVI21m6AKJsL5lwTHiJb+y2GTbHOF6ilVyrwCTyR9DWOdO KxLpBF/XxR4IupWMYGTqFGePmfIVxcuw0kztOIPH1n3OxoZS5nV2gbkc3U97OZXd+wgo Q2ig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nvv/uuf7iTKt5tREn4dpg3HuduBgDtv8cepjZZGCvlI=; b=xWED3AuUqf9ofy1F71hCyVUTq+q9YxaypXwy0X9ONBNRIMPSgx4Eeid0Dow8I8NcCi xIrHZtwSNJv8aR6CZK9Gl04l1EczeqzR1YViSFsm6MCiYXjnqGaerCK6tQTCrIKfT3HV 57zWZ9y+dMuGYFAW35e4MTvXqfZPHmYlTrPtjv/ttyKgscllCW6JQ7fHcVrME305Q08y ZwIdfBzpUcJAZ+8gwI2SbHOMut2/4xoSmBtYr1s6sucLrwqJGPJzS+3yrcdioHdeTbcZ F6m8gSZnJIIOGNAGM2WA8+kyP1KQ+QNg65skj832Z3XS+zp0W+mBS+CYobu9WhkRKcjz 6iCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531NxXYu36XQZCFTOhdIv0ut3x0vc/pRkuJbDKhzV/ugWI0sRdSs Rbnhrmq5d0WlVNpzbk/dejp00HEt2/YXeLAt3Nk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2Y8GvdeS8uLZxTlAjf+VsN1ZqHWQxZ6jvbruW4zQPnI8NTLYv9+wu2PsoP8iW9CfaNjUe3T7ul30rrSJYJAg=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:d38e:: with SMTP id b14mr29459554vsj.13.1634578516315; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwa4ChOsuMkmoP_sAGv3Wn2AcSz1OkijmxZzP+MGvnwviA@mail.gmail.com> <849D7F9E-8AD4-4CE8-A66C-358FB1F2E6AE@tzi.org> <3AC61568-DBDC-4ADB-9935-9C53333AE7E2@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZvCq7R=WBFsrwf51CKSN8ur0Yj-F=VOHnP=hQD0ooj-A@mail.gmail.com> <890A4965-D847-4606-849C-A0C8D8FD3B0C@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZtBiuh5n3U_pKma1s4ymPOCy7CY0pFaaacx6NDYNu5AQ@mail.gmail.com> <44C4286C-408C-4280-8956-3DA2931AFFF1@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <44C4286C-408C-4280-8956-3DA2931AFFF1@akamai.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:35:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZaxKTwout-M2eKm2R9s7-kHzXW_uj626FLJ7y4X28PFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2902705cea3f799"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZB3wH5OvA-4ZFzlzCcmGb_S_t3Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 17:35:22 -0000

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:51 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> Are normative references to X509 now not proper? Similarly, the next
> version of FIPS is a “diff” document around a couple of ISO documents; the
> cheapest price I found for them is USD $180.  Are normative references to
> FIPS 140-3 now not proper?
>

"Not proper" is a little hyperbolic, I think.  It creates a review barrier,
and that's the problem I'm trying to address.  A resolution to that barrier
doesn't have to involve declaring such a reference to be improper, and I
don't think that's what this is saying.

 We have a working group that supports IEEE point-to-point time protocol.
> That standard costs USD $280.  What should the NTP (and predecessor TICTOC)
> working group do?
>
>
Ask the IEEE for a freely available copy we can use, with restricted
distribution, to confirm compatibility between their standard and ours.
That's worked before (at least, I think it was the IEEE; might've been the
ITU).

-MSK


>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email