Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 27 January 2017 19:41 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D0E129858 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:41:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5F4kJjdCufMl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E08129857 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id k15so152587814qtg.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:41:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/3YsHGtT1N8Pvz5gP2XMVQ3h2y+4jcInqQ6fHbU9GRc=; b=02P4EQjAXLg6m7DbzhnBMmpX5r5s6IhZJdRzVCa5m95oddMGlTuXX3caLsY8D4uLwK 3wcNSkVflcZ0K6jbVby1RUyjO5bQ5NTtqhwrihYaEmGwyyIEibkAYVEmgLXHmLCXX6xN Vay1/BWOsAjxbFeJvdlGKZFEUKKjiaRikss7K4ix+/z0Ya8T2I7pman/jmGjp4ksT2/q tzTSn3vEVapGBpB+jDnVYwPpsukCgPAsrx6GYv+/0RD34H2HjTcXD6RnSFv1j3oPXjXd bjTmYE8gsfIOSV2KoR7jZOcJ849A+ywhBrU1gFC63OgbHNEs5Kf2H5tFt13T7N3tEGos UmJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/3YsHGtT1N8Pvz5gP2XMVQ3h2y+4jcInqQ6fHbU9GRc=; b=DvgoeLRZ4HSh+vM4qyrZuGxn3mgm6ST01NL1bjxQRk65tff8mPOwMPaedpks4gZrDp vcRYYEJBjWrz1KG+E7P+Q9zSn3ZE1NaFYOezo5jWoMC1mG4CSIdaq4VByLdIbtbDUvkh evaXjn72QcuCt1L9Y1au6QKqno+vdgAnsy3fjtUrDFq4afgVz+XIm3uoJY17OtrZXH7F EyZahO3U3c6jf2v1g2HiURWzuXBlvJQ5MYENOtPC70L1zOQRVBF3uOmPcojiJgYVRXQr PSPQPMgsFq7HjxCeFcZEuJMpexXbZ1/a7b9QrZKkh+5CipIKXQrIaW8IHV8f3VuPo2vQ nHvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKJfTqe4Ej9OkS31c8Sr/znrxh7VK7HE1DMLWy+ggTlcVMvvubJBz4tX1x9sWDlskP5NRO3R5zcsBTbQVXf
X-Received: by 10.55.189.130 with SMTP id n124mr10046664qkf.235.1485546087710; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:41:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.179.19 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:40:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:40:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJ78ECZ5x8LsR53KhRFnbhi3gV7n8yzG07e1wbN-SG14Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
To: Dave Burstein <daveb@dslprime.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ScFFyZg36SB5fwma_5nYOZmt_1M>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Disgust" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:41:30 -0000
If only we had some sort of a list or working group where things like meeting venues could be discussed. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mtgvenue/documents/ https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mtgvenue/current/maillist.html W On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Dave Burstein <daveb@dslprime.com> wrote: > Folks > > The IETF has generally steered clear of political entanglements, which I > think wise. Nonetheless, I raise the question of whether we should respond > to the proposed U.S. ban on nationals of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, > Syria, Yemen. > > Scott Aaronson reports one of his MIT students will probably have to leave > if he can't get his visa removed. We all know how many Iranians are > world-class technologists, including in computer science and electrical > engineering. > > I hope many from outside the United States speak up. The issues around Trump > make it hard to be objective here. > > Should we take a stand? > > If so, should it be symbolic or substantive? > > Symbolic actions could include: > > A resolution > Establishing remote hubs for our meetings in Iran and one of the Arabic > speaking countries. ISOC has funded remote hubs. > Outreach in Farsi and Arabic to show that whatever actions the government > takes, the IETF welcomes participation. This could be as simple as Jari > Arkko writing a letter to the editor of the leading newspapers with an > invitation for all to join our work. > > Some might also think that we should move the July 2018 meeting from San > Francisco to a location accessible to more of our members, perhaps to Mexico > or Canada. > ------------ > > As we discuss this, I urge everyone to avoid distracting comments about U.S. > politics. We're not going to change many minds here pro or con the new U.S. > President. > > Instead, let's keep the discussion here to how we should respond to a major > nation refusing visas to so many of our members. > > Dave Burstein > > > -- > Editor, Fast Net News, 5GW News, Net Policy News and DSL Prime > Author with Jennie Bourne DSL (Wiley) and Web Video: Making It Great, > Getting It Noticed (Peachpit) -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
- If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IE… Dave Burstein
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Warren Kumari
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], sh… S Moonesamy
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Clint Chaplin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Emily Shepherd
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Adam Roach
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Paul Wouters
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… nalini.elkins
- Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], sh… S Moonesamy
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… John Leslie
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Stephen Farrell
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dave Crocker
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… George Michaelson
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jeffrey Altman
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… nalini.elkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Roni Even
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… John C Klensin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Naeem Khademi
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Naeem Khademi
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Leif Johansson
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Leif Johansson
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Stewart Bryant
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Dave Cridland
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Leif Johansson
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Christer Holmberg
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Niels ten Oever
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… David Farmer
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… nalini.elkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Walid AL-SAQAF
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Niels ten Oever
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Michael StJohns
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Alia Atlas
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… John C Klensin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Saifi Khan
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Paul Wouters
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Emily Shepherd
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dan Harkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Emily Shepherd
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Alejandro Acosta
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dan Harkins
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Arturo Servin
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dan Harkins
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Naeem Khademi
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… S Moonesamy
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Stephen Farrell
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Tim Chown
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Jari Arkko
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… nalini.elkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Bless, Roland (TM)