Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 30 January 2017 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F183812945D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:59:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XlOfPces-vvf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1B812945A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r141so29876467wmg.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:59:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l++Q1YmaYQ4YDeMDi7yz3hzDF8YdUi+P5AVAurfDS/U=; b=qbQaQAMMX5W+ppzt9sPAlPoH9IPHGzhmDeW2ouxGeH3yzm1OKUq2ULkSJ9sJqvBozU K24dcEAg9K4cydsb8Ijws6+fCj4Im3CfC65Lv0HS/I+jVKnFo87lfec5hKqqNEh3FrqO QFN2YHyat9gMWUHOChl03g7rhzXshUJEsyXrZo3BsHKoiRAIv7YF/hVAww2oBGCUyPet qdPbYrhMVcy7cKNx+H/ZNc9ldVm+4uRtymwGM2naRp0YG2CZxLtG5Tbsn9cywlDvCPQL beSLEiuRH5HX8Yr61C212B1aYcZgiz030ZlopMk6bNr1trWuc5W0RFQhSdolv2kXxqD0 a8zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l++Q1YmaYQ4YDeMDi7yz3hzDF8YdUi+P5AVAurfDS/U=; b=fU+ZGtNqJY0FZIfJdSCE0RdxhTEdVZgKwO/V3qjz0vErPEj9Sn9M9OWI0WH23Kx5L6 xXuX8fNhLOqv8y9f0jnYu/KA++h9zQsCnsN4C4kDy1m53tkw3Nsh/U0dRbi9Z8J14vJT ++mmrOI1yK5DwAqYUgNC+spp8NgtRvqHil0Hg/I/aEab7PZ5h5YNzt5MMmQGrCgZVeXc sf8pCW6lmiJQy8lm4jbkQTJ5YGxJIhUpP34s2zjQXG8zDaNwhM4dAvcq3vXUh/8dyD2D 1D0QnoaaQuSyq6NNOWf14DsQ/ZIgjSJf0tZnQXmrN8EOS6RtGz8DubC/KegMxDUkH1vD YQsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIJMx5ootIKEbZra68ZVNYaDQ+J9pl5z/PWWMX6y/Ws/GGz1F8Qren836V10LqSBA==
X-Received: by 10.28.220.135 with SMTP id t129mr14701580wmg.97.1485777585743; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t103sm22542697wrc.43.2017.01.30.03.59.45 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:59:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <8f5ef9ac-b62b-863a-0a0e-f5d2b329de09@nostrum.com> <20170129134410.GA14422@gsp.org> <4D233FE8-6E84-446F-A8ED-604E4F7EAB99@piuha.net> <0d60ed80-2183-e329-05ad-e0cd7ab77ac1@cs.tcd.ie> <ebc650e4-3e42-5472-5c5f-ac5c0e5fc09f@dcrocker.net> <83add474-9949-2406-89d5-a753231166c9@gmail.com> <649728F5964CE764D9E82B81@PSB> <CAEjQQ5VsTkQ-SdE98DarFSBMacUReTEQs8j1X4RL0CJ3ttS7kg@mail.gmail.com> <c241c16b-109e-2a83-4a1c-a8ace446dbf5@mnt.se>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <97ce22fb-60f9-8983-cc89-d786c75c5f42@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:59:42 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c241c16b-109e-2a83-4a1c-a8ace446dbf5@mnt.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qFTD9YMghTkk8SW52_3tr6icYUY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:59:49 -0000


On 30/01/2017 11:52, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> relocated to Europe or elsewhere (at least for the next 8 years "until
>> we know what's going on there" ;-).
> nailed it
>

Maybe the ITU could host us in Geneva :)

Being a UN body they have hosting rights for all UN recognised 
countries, and presumable a few more besides.

Stewart