IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BF23A1104; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=cisco.com header.b=Aj3jRtj4; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=pxty8NzJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mDVeItYrYimq; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6B03A10EC; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8A6F40719; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3579F4074B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Aj3jRtj4; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=pxty8NzJ
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6ujdUNuXUxx for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4A71F40745 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2952; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1603737383; x=1604946983; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ZL/VYmotg2o29f/rxByRTvkKExMzhuS3p4AG/2DY3Y0=; b=Aj3jRtj4WgaKg1ld8+1i+W6OUuxifbRbKkR9AYunT3i3sNkFS0ZJ89Mq bxaVajKR2Ik/udqiMPh96UjKHu/MePkGCTE5KDXwAJKMTEcf9ah1zxGSg BAPD9IonlalTmj+eMh/UoVz8p4P1jqprKFzA50VU7B033fdY/KrzJBZSR 4=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:WtB+FhTx9ZjpqZaKaFLbq8cDntpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESQBNuJ6O9BgvDX9abtRT9I7ZWAtSUEd5pBH18AhN4NlgMtSMiCFQXgLfHsYiB7eaYKVFJs83yhd0QAHsH4ag7Rv3i79z9UHBjjZkJ5I+3vEdvUiMK6n+m555zUZVBOgzywKbN/JRm7t0PfrM4T1IBjMa02jBDOpyhF
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AHCACaFpdf/4QNJK1gHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIFPgVJRB4FJLywKhDKDSQONRooQjmqCUwNVCwEBAQ0BAS0CBAEBhEoCF4F0AiU4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FYQyFcgEBAQMBEhERDAEBNwEPAgEGAhgCAiYCAgIfERUQAgQBDQUbB4MEgkwDDiABiCWQagKBO4hodoEygwQBAQWFFA0LghAJgQ4qgnKDcIJEhBMbggCBOByCTT6CGoIjgxczgiyTVqNgVAqCapVshQ0DH6Fekz2NY5JVAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFrI4FXcBVlAYI+UBcCDY4fg3GKVnQ4AgYBCQEBAwl8jDsBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,420,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="587076001"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 26 Oct 2020 18:36:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09QIaKWC013640 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:36:21 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:36:20 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:36:19 -0500
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:36:19 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aU54LmElbWAhRT7bMO2sWI2Cj8pSJMKIMoJcCSXQ00cqixaLiuzb81CokXOhh2F37NbuyI65Z2a3NYWb6XG/P7lcASmDZk9PERflm6Cmg01rOtPnwALcpt6gFFryLoa11rx4hXhOS23RJ4xxm8N7UK+m8qDX8oh/lGUHm2SHR5nq1XWBhBIfkDxuekjsBkZphc5kyNHOLn8/dRueU030vP9OFhHlFUXL5bQqvXTqmXAWSI3WrP2S+7Hx24FB2PKa0quEgIqENLnZ5+v4X30CzkHBQ/z51wU5FnTCI9RuN+DO26Pj+K2KeQb3u29tkJpK79o0YHceTQE2JT70Uu5cOg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZL/VYmotg2o29f/rxByRTvkKExMzhuS3p4AG/2DY3Y0=; b=JhfMJ+rJjqVWhZJGUBHR3RIF2Pix72LWIwGPpJHqLKTRyL+mq2YINu7a/NU7HhUv5ZApLhJHy29Y0pSpWr/olorKs8rOXG3vZWTVYUcT9Iub6pRcSoKBOMomVYrG97oMwbDV6Pk//xJ4zdLwLJ6d0JQZ87vMWWG+lfVkw7y4uu8CjfqiACqkga6mI2ruLCkvI/j4CiWIo1g3zvR9ZSUo2THqNCi+SslQPXjUyU14kzk1lRQuBj8rpt7c7bHj1OR+z2U+hN++PY4kM5ymDsEL75WNQ76zUUV3/2XkBd1Xaga75iM2s1/Y0JdPzqYoDnOKKGiYKuRUsJ8+ewrsFTu0sA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZL/VYmotg2o29f/rxByRTvkKExMzhuS3p4AG/2DY3Y0=; b=pxty8NzJtRxD15RTDvgnVCnpLqlIFpldXulJ8M+o8C9r6KVKntu39uHVDxAmt+xESQY99urPCxPpyWCqvhDk4CaQSPazcA+cheao9nXTTBaIj7CsNh6xfi2Z2QV985gGaxJmi5eD7Fd33g6fc9gafq8T9Xj+I43GTmrar3fq9Ik=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by SJ0PR11MB5120.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:2d1::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3477.20; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:36:19 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1ddc:cdb4:32cc:f078]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1ddc:cdb4:32cc:f078%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.028; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:36:19 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Thread-Topic: [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences
Thread-Index: AQHWqzxsx5EfibdyW0y0SzPTh9Cp+amptXoAgAAiqgCAACQVgIAALOaAgAALIoD//7/9gA==
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:36:19 +0000
Message-ID: <66D76329-D7FB-4F44-897D-73E7E8B43771@cisco.com>
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <CADaq8je85zUHcCOMW6wCy+fiYUPfVE-1sjy3_Xhsxg85ACOkpQ@mail.gmail.com> <A062DE7F-4D21-4731-B59C-89232EACAF5C@tzi.org> <CAHw9_iJQ93M=Mkxd5H0QxgRUcwCTwVmkwFXjgBrKTnpcksx08g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJQ93M=Mkxd5H0QxgRUcwCTwVmkwFXjgBrKTnpcksx08g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: kumari.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;kumari.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b9ed7b4b-9855-49d5-b712-08d879de07af
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SJ0PR11MB5120:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SJ0PR11MB5120821B6F67F85A673F276AC2190@SJ0PR11MB5120.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ntftH0khATW0HUo8RgBq5nsJdKJMm1jv6B6dL3KAyS+dJulfHOAusjzVqasWXSvAQWf2pVrRdZoXrKcA6lyYMm17PDhYjcmNwOim5BJTbgU0akQkav0UNmfUa511uwMDUkL3n8z7bcLRtpyTH97B+Yb8XpOJqNBVpmiI/se14s5X66dyvGzh4UBHY7jcG+W8o0O4zKaf55T40SKQ/uV914FNiDlQfATboVmudnSC0iK55nqm8vs+sW3kuN5far8SAY3qL/96h9siVJ6FVeDs0Dbnq5K++aIqLCsbYVqPoMJ3eM5Pvc7xnXXVjRab5tXiUxovM1p0rleQ2DiVdL27ow==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(2616005)(71200400001)(6512007)(4326008)(86362001)(66556008)(36756003)(66476007)(66946007)(186003)(110136005)(8676002)(26005)(33656002)(76116006)(478600001)(5660300002)(316002)(6506007)(6486002)(4001150100001)(53546011)(66446008)(54906003)(64756008)(2906002)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-ID: <A7A70F30C644A745AD7E82DDBCDF05E0@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b9ed7b4b-9855-49d5-b712-08d879de07af
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Oct 2020 18:36:19.0822 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Ap0zk9K4Nk8nDhK7NFCH2aM1meUa0pMr5EVTn7GdxhmLfJXqEMHSXRlahi9DvKjR
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR11MB5120
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:18:50 -0700
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


On 10/26/20, 2:26 PM, "WGChairs on behalf of Warren Kumari" <wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of warren@kumari.net> wrote:

    On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 1:45 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    >
    > On 2020-10-26, at 16:04, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >
    > > Obviously, with canonical XML, there is no good solution to this problem:
    > >
    > > It's not clear what problem you are referring to.
    >
    > The problem will become very evident once you get an RFP asking that your product implement the procedure on page 68 of RFC 9815.

    Yup -- I've already run into this sort of thing when talking with
    authors and others -- I used to be able to say things like "Erm,
    section 3, um... just above the bottom of the page..." and now it
    involves much more quoting, etc.
    I also liked to collect stats on documents that I review -- e.g:
    (7,635 pages, ~31" / 79cm / 15 reams of single-sided paper).
    Gamifying reviews makes them easier...


    I really like the concept / history / continuity of RFCs being the
    same over these many years; I didn't really participate in the v3
    discussions, and am sad that the page numbers and similar have
    changed...

I wasn't involved in the RFC format discussion either but can't see how removing the pagination could have been seen as an advantage. Additionally, it is annoying that the htmlized version don't provide links to sections/sub-sections from TOC. 

Thanks,
Acee


    W

    >
    > You cannot really argue this based on whether people SHOULD be using section numbers etc.  This is a real downside in the real world.
    >
    > Now whether that downside is overriding all the other upsides of having page numbers, can be a subject of discussion.
    >
    > Grüße, Carsten
    >


    -- 
    I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
    idea in the first place.
    This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
    regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
    of pants.
       ---maf


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email