Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 26 October 2020 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5FB3A0BFD; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vB9XcNg8NXG2; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C903A0DB5; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66FBF40708; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B25F40708 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qjeVZPKNadJi for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2678F406F7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30500 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2020 18:55:17 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=7722.5f971b95.k2010; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=rgm7OVUW6VPuFbkrBFftgjG4Ve2yWT4bsyJnyWqVcYA=; b=pFCkSg6CBnf25ak6ASfPzd9AAAtibMMrtC1H/HnpZIeo0TcG/kBJjxdJ4H0gVVEROhOIZ9RePFDeqZYE7ZzawZSdrNTCYVAZUYCvi1JRd7TPlJZtGb1V5XegD43HmKx2jAtq3b6ewcbeKCLklohT1bZBSDvGfXCMinDI88QuN31hWF5zr4jRiHV/yiHa4vFIuLDGBxT3q8x31QCCaGkl8HlusznWwFO4ZNh/GRLtq6zaUV3MFaZHmsR7Jfqhk3q/dNqb3V921oMPR2aJ1kkDv71BW1YsFbbek6t7GcdoSpO1+BMYk61NiSGPwrIbits11/sB/dN4JZ5aG7SeZpeWEg==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 26 Oct 2020 18:55:16 -0000
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:55:16 -0400
Message-ID: <829ef31-28d8-b335-ab4-fe2553aa1cab@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, rsoc@iab.org
In-Reply-To: <adb49858-babf-bbee-07d8-0b73c24e2c22@nostrum.com>
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <20201026150241.GK48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20201026162814.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu> <20201026164036.GO48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1a56dc3b-56ef-3ffb-a12b-44d5e0d0f835@levkowetz.com> <20201026171931.GP48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b733240-fc78-5a71-8920-ff84fbf64287@iecc.com> <d935e027-f45b-fbec-0072-23d1481c3e90@nostrum.com> <41d4240-9a6d-67b2-1c20-3ea7895fe8ca@iecc.com> <9c512e40-1a82-fdfb-a332-154b42456a5e@nostrum.com> <5f64e230-1aca-7083-9aac-ba497295f80@iecc.com> <adb49858-babf-bbee-07d8-0b73c24e2c22@nostrum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

>> No, it's something the IETF explicitly considered and rejected when it 
>> designed the new format.
>
> Which "it"? If you meant epub, RFC7990 says

No, I meant paginated text RFCs.  The arguments against them, that people 
will misunderstand what they are and use the page numbers as references, 
still seem persuasive to me.  Indeed, what else would they use them for?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest