Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 01:58 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF16C3A11E6; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ribose.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K99vk_jXjKJA; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D2A3A11C9; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570B5F407AA; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1044F407AA for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ribose.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ocK3bHazFsck for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1320073.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.132.73]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A2AF407A7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ihQ+YrFTq1Pv8giIrubQ92B+krytok7BoaxZ3xYQYD/jrWmiol7S+jGfQ7rLsXqVx8kHxUOwRvqLrEfKNn/vA7RsFSufmzUN3AYr68nr4jY9y4rn6AvuetR8KCSlISUQ7Rwn6yor6dDMTuCb5r3DM87dR5kRMvnkkDyfJlMCmnX0LqJv536Cc8h1J5HKOzWK3YS6PWATC7X7iIUE3WmZN7Y1OFMB5oznDvyVablwzjKBTengHr17fZR0h8ZYLHtC/h9x7AW3mW9nbJFsvbvzyewqaJv9DPu9euEPGye4oy3iN0Z5am5RzI/C2lVkDeRxnfKkl5EiKrSpP3gagxlSmw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5+MYVoqm/3MNLkUjqXLnwJmurJno8jFxgUaRpjt9458=; b=lssrBmANQ0TN6wZ3BmaUBYymZ+omhPL3BO++BKaCdHpPZcU83ENOjxiXy3foAWXqpR0Fcgl9/c/ghp9ZK9tjFkiUU9qmwhsXh/zNCa0f7A+lZtHLBmOq0hh1UAPLGunWsSPfrW9z9165BmqQzD8tOWuYDozQmtIchxrxK5CZA1/FJuKWHs/OovpwogP/gsrvNNdVFXXUrRXBYt06xDk2qpU2+kNUeLn7QHdNERaJ7MERd6pOatDTX8/r7+dw09RiPpH4Yel0uXXH5GKaSYlZuD+ZYMg6yAInzoiQQ0X2So3FKGfS3oRrRYjAZwyLPdzhplJCeKcgcEFXjKjA1q/zhQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ribose.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ribose.com; dkim=pass header.d=ribose.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ribose.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5+MYVoqm/3MNLkUjqXLnwJmurJno8jFxgUaRpjt9458=; b=ItpjRXmbjZn23pXJXkWI0RMA2MahSxoEQ3n6FqjdOYU3GpexDOIldX1MF9HvwCNm/yd2s2b2g3AE92uSUtT83YlJFVNpeD6EvcrLImdbQia1qNcm8CB6tl6807f2fthXjXCMe6sxY40LmTVKIvThtauUdILjzn7BHZyV9K3Bz4U=
Received: from HK0PR01MB2900.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:1096:203:98::14) by HKAPR01MB3745.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:1096:203:d5::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.18; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:58:09 +0000
Received: from HK0PR01MB2900.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::b8:4b19:ebf4:7724]) by HK0PR01MB2900.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::b8:4b19:ebf4:7724%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3477.029; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:58:09 +0000
From: Ronald Tse <tse@ribose.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
Thread-Index: AQHWq8nHuGg0JtFOcUGgjys0Ih1qXamqaPaxgAAmtQCAAAn2gIAADAmAgAAEWYCAAAZCgIAAAWIA
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:58:09 +0000
Message-ID: <6C241BB8-470D-42FD-90D6-5041C7076AF5@ribose.com>
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.c om> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <20201026150241.GK48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20201026162814.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu> <20201026164036.GO48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1a56dc3b-56ef-3ffb-a12b-44d5e0d0f835@levkowetz.com> <20201026171931.GP48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b733240-fc78-5a71-8920-ff84fbf64287@iecc.com> <20201026180105.GQ48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <03976f9f-7f49-7bf7-ce29-ee989232a44d@gmail.com> <7FA8EF59-5CDE-42B9-A487-520531EEA1F0@juniper.net> <65374aef-e018-7bc8-ce50-d5c0a3982bf7@gmail.com> <DE3C9D6AE8EF94D87936DAE7@PSB> <75918E93-96A2-4C9A-9D60-570E7A0E1B22@ribose.com> <C393B7270B2043C75B6CA7B8@PSB> <EB282B9A-8562-43B5-AC65-31FD2CF64C5D@ribose.com> <3F09EF2A87B102C8666C72D0@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <3F09EF2A87B102C8666C72D0@PSB>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
authentication-results: jck.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;jck.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ribose.com;
x-originating-ip: [118.140.121.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8cf04d64-4b1d-4c33-a61d-08d87a1bc0fe
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HKAPR01MB3745:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HKAPR01MB3745971FFB10A67E3350A855D7160@HKAPR01MB3745.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Ep22XZnDRlS7aY8zzL/cC6RDAxw+lPidHLRd/kgNhzgYMtey2+LgyrY+kz4cuLKcAQBaO4Y+jbX1SZrQV6wInCks3qkElvQcN/dAF096ZrMtn05pSwFWx169JS/CMfhhnpglRoUUINEv4hPVlnUECERfKUdyA4GxNbSgcJo9R3sSqrD8DH88a1rAJZh2HlgI2jraYtDjpLxdB54kvLh1ChfhhFVDoinAMI5Jsg/4xU9tG7ueFiLnICKGrD1KwxLjjwZHaSlZg+RqTUSNdnZaG2Ieb4caVKlsuMKFr60AmcXcY55QF126wr084oIfceMp/R6L5fALkQJTiKgeGGyCVg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HK0PR01MB2900.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(136003)(376002)(39830400003)(396003)(366004)(346002)(4326008)(2906002)(83380400001)(86362001)(66946007)(5660300002)(6916009)(2616005)(8676002)(4744005)(186003)(8936002)(66446008)(26005)(91956017)(66476007)(478600001)(71200400001)(33656002)(36756003)(316002)(6486002)(76116006)(54906003)(6512007)(66556008)(64756008)(6506007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ribose.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HK0PR01MB2900.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8cf04d64-4b1d-4c33-a61d-08d87a1bc0fe
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Oct 2020 01:58:09.1926 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d98a04ff-ef98-489b-b33c-13c23a2e091a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rtxif76tLb5UTaCPWx8R+rq7HOudjOt59lJ7kD+V6x9hDFEPiBoBGUyks6svpnBp
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HKAPR01MB3745
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "rsoc@iab.org" <rsoc@iab.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0012902487377362190=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
Thanks for the message. I do agree with most of your points, and may have had trouble expressing that. In the last example you also described why the page numbers between PDF and TXT output will not sync: But two of several advantages of the contemporary (xml2rfc v3) PDF version is that it can contain and render pictures easily and that, if characters are used outside the ASCII repertoire, they are rendered correctly as well. It’s not easy synchronizing page numbers between two paginated outputs if rendered objects are allowed to have different dimensions (e.g. ASCII art in TXT vs SVG in PDF). _____________________________________ Ronald Tse Ribose Inc.
_______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- Re: [rfc-i] The role of txt format in ietf docume… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Eliot Lear
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Warren Kumari
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Jay Daley
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs q… Jay Daley
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [rfc-i] Not even sort of a Poll: RFCs with pa… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ronald Tse
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rfc-i] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs quest… David Noveck
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… David Noveck
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John Scudder
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Henk Birkholz
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … David Noveck
- Re: [rfc-i] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs quest… Fred Baker
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Randy Bush
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John Scudder
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … John Scudder
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Michael StJohns
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Julian Reschke
- [rfc-i] An attempt to summarize the "page numbers… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Salz, Rich
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Ted Lemon
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… John Scudder
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page num… Ted Lemon
- [rfc-i] The role of txt format in ietf document d… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Andrew Campling
- Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty … Mark Andrews
- Re: [rfc-i] The role of txt format in ietf docume… Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] The role of txt format in ietf docume… Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] The role of txt format in ietf docume… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] The role of txt format in ietf docume… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rfc-i] An attempt to summarize the "page num… Julian Reschke