Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Tue, 27 October 2020 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680583A1287; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=juniper.net header.b=ueqfF4YF; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=juniper.net header.b=idp0aQgW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJpXmJzvJW9m; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD3A3A12B9; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166F1F40712; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D67DF40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=ueqfF4YF; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=idp0aQgW
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b5cKKgAKCTqL for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F737F4070E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09RHlkRX024631; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:37 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=sJxBv7yu0w2Yvn/UyLYi/2gs339evlI/HayJQA8ZOWE=; b=ueqfF4YFXTzAA5JKBannooHQu1hsDDFhJM/gW25AAvS2kuBlDqreKJNs6BpBndsPlgI1 U0kBUMwVrC2TKp0eiN7ospSzzJqspX63zSeqFJwv4d05JyfQBO3ZDeiXt0+jZQLYF9Xd v/fa3KNL/wlhoQkQ3jUCwAc8xugjCa0pRbKhrxSSIU1SdRxJkL7I9I26sARr+6HXYYGn tOKyQQ4gsYQf/zNH7Ya6DUDgrlguRjuhVmqi//2YS7o4X9j8TDpBIQiqQNFp5DqgY2E0 yzDULx1h6/xEz022I3DldgYSigzHFYXd79VF++ufUdUReSLn42z3guCoKA2UYt03+ZIw mQ==
Received: from nam12-bn8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam12lp2175.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.55.175]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 34e7a7hmvg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:54:37 -0700
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=eHM1qNsGRgC/7BDtTaqdFPjQnMJCumFdO7lOtJ8tKiCL6BrDrA0iHJxKJkILR5bmp+WvO0e8WmLDPAstv3QNEcV2LXRX+6OcDATeZs/H3k2kn8eoTHGJo8gGyZUbDGo1Kkog/nu21hQLhWlcjG4uCIIEH3Fzi0mLKWxj2tcmyFz6ijvADfk3LoOXaKuOrlyeVI0LjVz9Ob07q3yV4GVdfuUEzDxuaLphnHbeArzxU8V8kb8iA144RlngDe//nk7UWpZ37pexqc4DdAulMtihjjh5BP/9X43OO8RiylX/trZ/KRZwOT4bSkWhG5F0gFOo3ZbQLnyGgA0T4RJdphLQ1g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sJxBv7yu0w2Yvn/UyLYi/2gs339evlI/HayJQA8ZOWE=; b=iNfb0MVaUG7YH25D3FfBedVeCsq8+8GDzE6p4YcfWzmJKOkq4jn8Ab9kJKzTgkXEdKJ5E9H7ZPx3r0UUlAGwPObs9lZhC4UGYT7v/C3vhVsLcwl7k3zEv0Mo571EadzbhtVtzr66wWpw3+rhCLadf1dUsve32R8SK8YvDVxdK3iC39Mw5qY8nK+wFTaBV/0KEeAMK+clzZZMWrU2/4Utl3PnPUVnZfupWAIn1KUfHQZphj/MpUDfc+RKwVbxpJl9dGHj4teEvM8f9KIzhkvXkP19my6htS488rpqoALewyIXiN/uaPw19n/gtuuMXnLkSMoQaaA8V7hLJ3fr9e8mxQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sJxBv7yu0w2Yvn/UyLYi/2gs339evlI/HayJQA8ZOWE=; b=idp0aQgWIHQLLclT6NbIo94EtLN8rvdGI50r3NBYq3owVksKh0sISXElLsiF/2aArcCh2ppD2J2vRE58M/1QunWj4jBqBM/BRAqAnLUKrr3Ozuo5z+lQKmsLMCrmAdT8xRmjNJ3yx01Jzk74r5V9MYEWxQlfjcOEaVprneCPjQ0=
Received: from MN2PR05MB6109.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:c4::20) by MN2PR05MB6927.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:18a::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.13; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:54:33 +0000
Received: from MN2PR05MB6109.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d98c:bc2d:3620:9b38]) by MN2PR05MB6109.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d98c:bc2d:3620:9b38%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.017; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:54:33 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
Thread-Index: AQHWq8nMCYpO5VS1YEG8krmFqjboKKmqYm8AgAFVzgCAAAEzgIAAA3BF
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:54:33 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEF79AB-8CDF-4414-BBB8-D1EA9716F82F@juniper.net>
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <20201026150241.GK48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20201026162814.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu> <20201026164036.GO48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1a56dc3b-56ef-3ffb-a12b-44d5e0d0f835@levkowetz.com> <20201026171931.GP48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b733240-fc78-5a71-8920-ff84fbf64287@iecc.com> <20201026180105.GQ48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <03976f9f-7f49-7bf7-ce29-ee989232a44d@gmail.com> <7FA8EF59-5CDE-42B9-A487-520531EEA1F0@juniper.net> <m2sg9z1seh.wl-randy@psg.com>, <3DC65259-20A7-4AFA-BC24-604AB184081E@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <3DC65259-20A7-4AFA-BC24-604AB184081E@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: psg.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;psg.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [162.225.191.192]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 29582fb3-8e1c-4504-bd00-08d87aa15cad
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR05MB6927:
x-ld-processed: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR05MB69272E7F30A96E864773080DAA160@MN2PR05MB6927.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: VBVs+DuwvEnKnX8kf9VTeqdi17HqVfztp2nVZxEtu4XfxWAQN2vbBHpuEzhWB9s4S2i4H3CN1kgCczu3ukKkmM3dKXpkyC7oIBHf/tdqZHvai5fX1OOmUraA9BNrhA+0ajW5XgLgYaITFI/nnjPMH+7hTlQ2fl0RrXcN35iVBubN3TAS9MhGzncQyXFmDNoPU3QC1Ic4AUQfOQ7SHC6mkxpanc9/fjcrQzz/KbOnovmUCjXg81FVJJGdLBV1Fo7th1LRY/4P8qcUA/ea4vZhOO5lu6QTQa+JUwRCwKDCL8dTO56/cvk6iKXVPxLOKKEWA31ukaTU1FnCxWsXsfIH3zYKl9Nn4AEw8hcR52giAJm+dasysSqOJ39CvSdGbGLmU5xb0i1wGHPGgeBBhssG3A==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR05MB6109.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(376002)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(54906003)(66446008)(71200400001)(5660300002)(6512007)(26005)(36756003)(83380400001)(8676002)(6506007)(86362001)(316002)(478600001)(66946007)(66476007)(6916009)(76116006)(2616005)(2906002)(186003)(66556008)(91956017)(33656002)(4326008)(53546011)(6486002)(966005)(64756008)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR05MB6109.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 29582fb3-8e1c-4504-bd00-08d87aa15cad
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Oct 2020 17:54:33.4199 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: r79ojQLOP6b07s3pSZ7GMqIeyyKYbML6exKKV4kg0C9KM2MOJSbyhFsKnX7pJ9F6
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR05MB6927
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-27_10:2020-10-26, 2020-10-27 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxlogscore=917 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010270106
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "rsoc@iab.org" <rsoc@iab.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

As a reminder for those who have lost track, this thread was kicked off by Toerless saying he would like to be able to render his own copies to include a useful table of contents, for his own use, at home, probably with the blinds drawn to keep the world from witnessing his shame. A little while later Henrik said in no uncertain terms that adding the capability to xml2rfc would be trivial, and that he’d be happy to do it, but that he was specifically directed not to do so.

So far, nobody has even attempted to justify this directive, although a zoo of straw men has been paraded through the subsequent follow ups. 

—John

> On Oct 27, 2020, at 1:42 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> 
> 
> You’re perfectly allowed. Use enscript, or whatever pagination tool you want. The issue is not that you aren’t allowed—it’s that if the IETF provides a pagination tool, we will be perceived as having provided page numbers, and those page numbers may then be used when referencing documents. By making you take the step of paginating, we avoid that worry.
> 
> Of course, if your goal is just to be annoyed at dem kids, please continue… :)
> 
>>>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>>> The argument that page numbers are harmful for *any* *purpose*
>>>> *whatever* is not reasonable. ... A table of contents, in short.
>> <doh>  no can do.  might make document more useful. </snark>
>> and if you drop it on the floor, you can put it in the card sorter.  oh
>> wait.  :)
>> what i find shocking here is the "we know best, and you will not be
>> allowed attitude," an authoritarianism which seems to have become
>> more and more popular.
>> randy, going back under my rock
>> _______________________________________________
>> rfc-interest mailing list
>> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VIhQWQApr4DvECYK83EOx4p68Kxuixee5QgwjzWjYc2kt0IuDGK6SspEWifMgQ$
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest