IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 28 October 2020 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094C63A0EE7; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a94sDm9FGWN2; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59953A0EE5; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E117F40739; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 04:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C406AF40739 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 04:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wPxs4hLmPTj8 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 04:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20E4FF40737 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 04:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603886399; bh=1gmwRYLBrlDFnVoG9SM3ay2e0S0RqvxdtGZ20cAX5qo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OIbCjLN50LX9BVyC4KotLXVl0jWmFWEwtuFU7sW+Y9RMWP8srLIl36OJdQqJkNvgR tR4udGQuE8V+4NHXz4TIOTVW/yhYjQYpXS7hw6V0oyjvdf+lk2KGlwMvjUopd9/o8F 52j29pk2AH6PlwDEBIi25RX0kcgdDAOdxTuqr6II=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.236] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mo6qv-1k1ARQ1Gxv-00pe4j for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:59:59 +0100
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <20201026150241.GK48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20201026162814.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu> <20201026164036.GO48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1a56dc3b-56ef-3ffb-a12b-44d5e0d0f835@levkowetz.com> <20201026171931.GP48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b733240-fc78-5a71-8920-ff84fbf64287@iecc.com> <20201026180105.GQ48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <03976f9f-7f49-7bf7-ce29-ee989232a44d@gmail.com> <7FA8EF59-5CDE-42B9-A487-520531EEA1F0@juniper.net> <m2sg9z1seh.wl-randy@psg.com> <3DC65259-20A7-4AFA-BC24-604AB184081E@fugue.com> <7AEF79AB-8CDF-4414-BBB8-D1EA9716F82F@juniper.net> <9ae1aaeb-5f42-5eb-e6cc-1a7e84c527@iecc.com> <dd25161f-f8fc-0481-2d06-00907f4068fa@levkowetz.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <38d20219-e16f-7fb4-9c7b-0051fcadac62@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:59:59 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <dd25161f-f8fc-0481-2d06-00907f4068fa@levkowetz.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Xbl2mcaUsQ6HSIQDTot1H7Gxjv6JhCmghvDKOQZCKaOwjO7zbLT 3ZyKIn9RBeaWssrRo2P7AWB/RtWZmG2s1sOMdY1WbP3mzQQ87XCOpblv0waQVHw42iAditU afphLdpCUGU4hB0BSGKfl2MJBVjwjsaQTLBz0tHtYE0C5DgWx+4KHcoDCOwM/7l7hp2Dpw9 S7kXmX3guXBLTovDuJinw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:oHv/gbwAmXQ=:lukcEixebvTI8p/QH8GCQ6 xr4p3mp5nsnUntHlf1sF4PZ2jtjcRUADs5mmxMlixEL/2FTLGHxZaqXY5Ki2AI51Vl1PQCVLe VUUqLsYiPO3x8XXdn/uQnIej3mqI5uAhe3Q/X6de7kpd4VrkmcmUEuTNUxAQFUIlal5zJs82W 2xeQtlDDMXCLy3mFJ4Est+EmuRgiPQiaN/42/ISaQbnO2hui42MJSqhFQGZJszhu6h0+/Z9Fa awpfgFAxpsWs4IZff6JFtLU4y6H7St8RFfLoeBlNthryGCdbqTPLiJ79kt9mm5C+Dhwr2RNsa lcrwQjkrlipFcoJT3AEiUTSF/80q/IAi+rF3UB3oneIhNP2RXzS2HjUnlzgIlMsd/FWUGjJ7D 3G6bNa3cZT/sIfO1zG2LA4OkrIxiczk4hBYQdSVu1hn2ygHW8Ky/fOzaQ7khERuRvJ0RpR6ua GxqxolN675JrQRUoBRdEUGR9iJHjvmR8ZV4hy11fUrozXziminDvCEaX/zxcyPuojvqwf1BXO iCL3KqiSSo3Z7YkBkYrIrwPFMGUP6aUZEg/c9jDFyosIKzcN0AWB+Z8pfAE5mKGfnZsPvmzJ1 WH2ZhnhkSXMEx2vFivvw6Fcn3o+2cYwSrEXjM3idxnrbihatDn1a0j8KjxhvgXWlNX5+NIyrk Btomzjs/u45donpIlpP62ZYz+z5kIh1NzadEWL0L3GecDpI0u+akqXeP4WBEioLG60Ye6aWK2 BFq8Iskg/qgHdB/IIz3l859Q3pk7mJUzEk2cuoKoEoTERIOgczvYV6/YMT62RRJE2+U206pjE fY+rP06AcSynXqTKWOWIueDcP/e8Yypl3GjV23mwY2rO/37miZsqYPXiKH5kN0ziDLtmeI/Df +C8PyPPQMyhg+LfAbTkg==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 28.10.2020 um 12:18 schrieb Henrik Levkowetz:
> ...
> Umm.  So why is it OK to provide this functionality as a script, but not OK
> to make xml2rfc able to do it?  I'm not talking about the RFC Editor publishing
> paginated text, I'm talking about permitting xml2rfc to do what you've just
> provided a tool to do.
> ...

That's indeed a good question.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email