IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences

Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> Tue, 27 October 2020 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB533A1098; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i2QI476liuRo; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 981053A1145; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF78F40749; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F91F40789 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25HpLi2rLVkJ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-edgeS23.fraunhofer.de (mail-edges23.fraunhofer.de [153.97.7.23]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C97F40788 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2FjGQBDR5df/xoBYJlgDhABAQsSDECBUYRWhDKQZS6aKYF8CwEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAS0CBAEBhEoCgg0BJTsDDQIQAQEGAQEBAQEGBAIChlaGTAEFIxVBEAsYAgImAgJHEAYBDAEHAQGDIoJ8BaUegTKFV4M/gUKBDiuGYYJEhBMPgU0/gTgPglo+h1SCXwSTUohTmzYrB4FhgQyBDwQLmU8FCh+DBQGPOAaPGpM9oDgCBAIJAhWBfgOBZU0kgzlPFwINnCg/gSsCBgoBAQMJfIw7AYEQAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A2FjGQBDR5df/xoBYJlgDhABAQsSDECBUYRWhDKQZS6aKYF8CwEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAS0CBAEBhEoCgg0BJTsDDQIQAQEGAQEBAQEGBAIChlaGTAEFIxVBEAsYAgImAgJHEAYBDAEHAQGDIoJ8BaUegTKFV4M/gUKBDiuGYYJEhBMPgU0/gTgPglo+h1SCXwSTUohTmzYrB4FhgQyBDwQLmU8FCh+DBQGPOAaPGpM9oDgCBAIJAhWBfgOBZU0kgzlPFwINnCg/gSsCBgoBAQMJfIw7AYEQAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,421,1596492000"; d="scan'208";a="21256494"
Received: from mail-mtaka26.fraunhofer.de ([153.96.1.26]) by mail-edgeS23.fraunhofer.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2020 23:07:29 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CbHQCXR5df/1lIDI1gDg8BAQEBCQESAQUFAUCBTwKCKIFIMDaEMpBlLpopgXwLAQMBAQEBAQcBAS0CBAEBhEoCggsCJTsDDQIQAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FbYVzAQUjFUEQCxgCAiYCAkcQBgEMAQcBAYMigwGlHoEyhVeDP4FCgQ4qAYZhgkSEEw+BTT+BOA+CWj6HVIJfBJNSiFObNisHgWGBDIEPBAuZTwUKH4MFAY84Bo8akz2gOAIEAgkCFYF+Aw2BV00kgzlPFwINnCg/QmkCBgoBAQMJfIw7AYEQAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,421,1596492000"; d="scan'208";a="94298179"
Received: from mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de ([141.12.72.89]) by mail-mtaKA26.fraunhofer.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2020 23:07:28 +0100
Received: from mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (mail.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.84.171]) by mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTPS id 09QM7RJd013336 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:07:27 +0100
Received: from [192.168.16.50] (79.234.114.246) by mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (141.12.84.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:07:22 +0100
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <CADaq8je85zUHcCOMW6wCy+fiYUPfVE-1sjy3_Xhsxg85ACOkpQ@mail.gmail.com> <A062DE7F-4D21-4731-B59C-89232EACAF5C@tzi.org> <CAHw9_iJQ93M=Mkxd5H0QxgRUcwCTwVmkwFXjgBrKTnpcksx08g@mail.gmail.com> <66D76329-D7FB-4F44-897D-73E7E8B43771@cisco.com> <20201026214815.GE23518@pfrc.org> <20201026215117.GY39170@kduck.mit.edu>
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <e4c40890-a703-40f4-067a-b297b1d5e3fc@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:07:22 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201026215117.GY39170@kduck.mit.edu>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [79.234.114.246]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:18:50 -0700
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

I also think that the Header in the tools' HTML version provides tons of 
convenience functions. So many in fact that the current status quo 
actually conditioned me to look for a "tools" annotation in a button on 
the datatracker. Maybe that's just me, though.

On 26.10.20 22:51, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> The native HTML format does.  I have no idea why the htmlization script
> can't or does not do so for new-format RFCs.
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email