IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A8C3A1217; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L1GK2lr0FyJn; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3C293A1209; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A16AF40713; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7507AF40713 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-ELEZXZKpk9 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E1EF40712 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 09RH5kb0065379 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:05:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1603818347; bh=QyryStWcaFlr+UJx5eLwpw4lSyw5xPBVvkZ4d8WlGNA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=KreITFaLgk6SBOLjI/VKlSJTY5qeTTnplPGu4Lj2PWmig4d0zM+HAiYNgw0sSaSNY gPyKoV9nKC0ttAKMhUOfiDYuic/f/wY9qyR5sE/bnmZHpTgH8f4g1UvgRLvBu/IRLi YEK/t4aE0LN+MU/PtWGoECfCInjuLE9ogsfus3iU=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <CADaq8je85zUHcCOMW6wCy+fiYUPfVE-1sjy3_Xhsxg85ACOkpQ@mail.gmail.com> <A062DE7F-4D21-4731-B59C-89232EACAF5C@tzi.org> <CAHw9_iJQ93M=Mkxd5H0QxgRUcwCTwVmkwFXjgBrKTnpcksx08g@mail.gmail.com> <66D76329-D7FB-4F44-897D-73E7E8B43771@cisco.com> <20201026214815.GE23518@pfrc.org> <b4b7c077-5a44-c8c1-65f9-a4307f4abd1c@sit.fraunhofer.de> <2b3f175f-bfff-c466-2db0-001e6dcb14e5@gmx.de>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <65f9efde-34d7-a7fb-8d82-3ded133f6a32@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:05:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2b3f175f-bfff-c466-2db0-001e6dcb14e5@gmx.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 10/27/20 12:00 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Am 26.10.2020 um 23:00 schrieb Henk Birkholz:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> TL;DR
>> Gave up on looking up rfc-interest WGLC results from years ago; plenty
>> use of the term surprise.
>>
>>
>> I admit, I was surprised by the notion that "there will be no more page
>> numbers" over a year ago. I was not involved in any way in WGLCs that
>> happened in rfc-interest in... 2015?
>
> There was no WG nor an LC. The discussions about this have happened many
> years before (I *think* on this list), and then the former RSE made
> decisions based on these discussions.

There was more to it than that:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/IGnzylKKPhSvjjOsM-Lme8GdEfo/

for example

>
> > ...
>
> Best regards, Julian
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email