IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 26 October 2020 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216FC3A0C9A; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9pIC8Psgvz6W; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D273A0CEA; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3855DF4074B; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4840F4074B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnBThrq7Higj for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74194F40745 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603737557; bh=wruN0GCtQ1v46K88if5u2GWC9NiZ3L6JQfr2c1thDEI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QBxxfgvQvvKmz7oIYQ2UfB3bhmC0tkxucVZFkdLJERVjJKEqRchJxz5NblFZdR+/R gLO21w+VQorsbh9pZKWp78kRCsbPzvxHdakET/5cX+scNIj0teYzIBa5FdqUH5MaWF nNVo3koqAjyl+37mEnVH+QUrNLMtUJ8th76KiYY8=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.55.157]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MowGU-1k31iN0DdO-00qVaJ for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:39:17 +0100
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <CADaq8je85zUHcCOMW6wCy+fiYUPfVE-1sjy3_Xhsxg85ACOkpQ@mail.gmail.com> <A062DE7F-4D21-4731-B59C-89232EACAF5C@tzi.org> <CAHw9_iJQ93M=Mkxd5H0QxgRUcwCTwVmkwFXjgBrKTnpcksx08g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <12e99970-cc46-01f3-7416-767b28faa40c@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:39:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJQ93M=Mkxd5H0QxgRUcwCTwVmkwFXjgBrKTnpcksx08g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:LyXUXqkG08MMc0ZhrTOx8OVoDgZIVuXLorng2YSTNuOpYc3d6rs 3iZgW/hINtS0FeXEGKUTMnEN4ca38k3Bhi4eDj88xM2jA23hwM8MAdaoiI5o39Tt2D1hLhU xUOtyNxk463eqhoDpVBmE3AG+GXDMa0xLKdmqfZld68yuWLmXfBF9e+A8mWitPxunFUFtfs rvJX9X46zqgMmJ/145vkg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:hTbXaV6GeZg=:y0ycIN+cZ3MI2jRMbQ7lB2 9Al9vUbBLj9hvmuTnRDF8yXWQSx3R6s2jKaUXXYtH8bgA4+M1wBId6SzkV9slWvZXPzfXr2CQ V1kAoq0gSo4ykfaVtoyUDG9v/OUu0aEh0z9U7OaRv67SG8TPPghPDpdzj4FXsPeJZH6er0p3D hU3PW1WTyl2192w/ULjEyLfTN262ulUvqPZ0SXEE0vKPSd6H2Kt9P0P1/Va2bZTaNM9+CbRpu oTJLVHImepu14oqtogjdne6sUt9wIgBEJDQsZXkTX17fFdMc4YLQGIqjBWWrzz+YOrTAh5HeV ivwDZTfKwrN17O7OM4cRVxI3lw4FXW4zLMLUmhyGrSqi0sL+Yt0X8YqCaVOCD4R+lGGtcf6aE NC/C2NDn2geZlYsQu71x4OBUYLSuOqSLNzRcBsHypWTjPFXcvR+ZqzWa7gN9V7N0LV5ss2EiC ST9eBzRswaV2ViyjUkHYI5vfBCvkMg3PowLrSQk828DNnCPpTp98Dk7kZTo6QsGVgWzZUV0WG I4WRyN8T9GkrHRgZfGJDubCUnEckfFy2SjyIfOtLhfIxuzs+No00CdVfdE3ZQZSVRdRp/JBJ8 yJUx/F1apFQX7OcCUztIc0Q/z/L4Isr3edYzb/IHaUdbT0RJCQP3lIA/E9Esu+kXjgugajf0H Hia5wKuNVfoXQncEwbYCewv57PwnoarvrnjkgH+UYRYSXSKuieXrOSlVDIFZSlnU2FraY76Pc 4g20tdnzyGE2PouwziyRqNYykgCBz68aCwquDnfvBWgxW7fIDJinks4t2nXfx9lY3DpJSO5LM lSd99LvlkblgW0aTcl32hmeuHOterLqEMV4IiKWllH+FSl+QemCONyG+MTNdfH6WNnK5+HQb0 Ej4RQ6wgN0EmagDC9Wig==
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [irsg] Resending: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 26.10.2020 um 19:25 schrieb Warren Kumari:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 1:45 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-10-26, at 16:04, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Obviously, with canonical XML, there is no good solution to this problem:
>>>
>>> It's not clear what problem you are referring to.
>>
>> The problem will become very evident once you get an RFP asking that your product implement the procedure on page 68 of RFC 9815.
>
> Yup -- I've already run into this sort of thing when talking with
> authors and others -- I used to be able to say things like "Erm,
> section 3, um... just above the bottom of the page..." and now it
> involves much more quoting, etc.
 > ...

In the HTML version, every block-level item (paragraph etc...) has an
anchor that you can link to.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email