Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 26 October 2020 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F33A0E73; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id My6CXSRgIGaI; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C439B3A0E6D; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACA8F40764; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA57F40763 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HzoorOKGQ07I for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC64F40761 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 39782 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2020 19:42:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=9b5c.5f9726b1.k2010; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=lC7PEOoW5NEJFZzZslutUBQguaZ0Z06EAutMbCBhDUI=; b=rxF6W3coA+82uTQ/KY4bR6S/8md1iwFwEKvNle7vDZptNUO3Bkf+AKgunxh7oyXhcm/9Kk0sRaGktnVxvTxxYsIu+2QPpuw26Nvv5GkcRz847bmytw6UVq3x2LpnKlk4HCIoBnXpMpQoKQ6L/RRIO2Er1UPJALY7riZoVCkZiGCeWX6ecw5t64aL/ptJtm2OCNHILTzZKjP78stpo7zyHVoSAn3EJk57ejW0fF6RIaqeo93NKCNiGx8blMwvEQNztT5GJ0tlv94cb84poAyJULqcUOPf2+TS6kbi4wZ0U7aYRoOjdoXHa2vNolmi5Q4MHlfek4MObR2tizEanU0rbA==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 26 Oct 2020 19:42:40 -0000
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:42:40 -0400
Message-ID: <fba415ea-da5a-216e-d444-6497f6ff8d91@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <50D3D00A-7495-458F-B24F-B555DEA27F6E@tzi.org>
References: <20201026020433.GA19475@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CADaq8je8gMwAkOndTNJ9ndwzOZb2HQMZrCUJ5wNUjw-6ax9QtA@mail.gmail.com> <35EFE952-7786-4E24-B228-9BEE51D3C876@tzi.org> <20201026150241.GK48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20201026162814.GP39170@kduck.mit.edu> <20201026164036.GO48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1a56dc3b-56ef-3ffb-a12b-44d5e0d0f835@levkowetz.com> <20201026171931.GP48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b733240-fc78-5a71-8920-ff84fbf64287@iecc.com> <d935e027-f45b-fbec-0072-23d1481c3e90@nostrum.com> <41d4240-9a6d-67b2-1c20-3ea7895fe8ca@iecc.com> <9c512e40-1a82-fdfb-a332-154b42456a5e@nostrum.com> <5f64e230-1aca-7083-9aac-ba497295f80@iecc.com> <adb49858-babf-bbee-07d8-0b73c24e2c22@nostrum.com> <829ef31-28d8-b335-ab4-fe2553aa1cab@iecc.com> <034901d6abca$3d3e60d0$b7bb2270$@olddog.co.uk> <50D3D00A-7495-458F-B24F-B555DEA27F6E@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] John/rsoc: Re: Page numbers in RFCs questions / preferences
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, rsoc@iab.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> However, many people who have to use RFCXMLv3 sense that it is time for an RFCXMLv4 (or 3.1, or 3 post-beta, ...) discussion.
> That would indeed be the time to look at the experience with v3 as documented in 799x and learn from it.

I wouldn't disagree but we still need to catch up with the differences 
between v3 as documented and v3 as implemented.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest