IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B553A09CF; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bgmQtmYPtloM; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B043A09CC; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDFAF4073C; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDEEF4073C for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TM3OmEtJLAn8 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5FC8F4073B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09SEY2uM021723; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:38:56 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=wat3I5wQtFERBBIecIQdGwkJzLTHTuwQu4Jx3DQgJQU=; b=IDL5WsnDmAzLT3M/zUJeqyjWkc3/GnhO0roOuzmAkAP/IaTKwfJpn66XjqP4QiZd7GPW StHqlIte2rSrYu0V9t6dsr9IjiBGKelbqq5jzD9kscqDgfyXHe/QfEj4ikBs9Rgl/VP4 4Mh2CpaAo1GU5dXjx5z+ARJTJXGjMuMdcE0nPoMFmyABHJPdacsIguylwxvepfZV50DL FzoZ4/PcPI/PsJw9GFU7D4HqVODHYx4seJRNQyVZaiEYGQlvPZ2XGF4/9Do5DimLqRBO AvVGvPh/l0mjjwbN9W1we3udM/ntiZVBEVpCF26wkALBx8zzC8Q9d+zKhER9QybSXBPO bQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 34ccpcx7m5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:38:56 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09SEZ33m012518; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:38:55 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 34f29jgs9s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:38:55 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag3mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:38:54 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:38:54 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.007; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:38:54 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
Thread-Index: AQHWrLmn/mJ443h27UikhXYaSL8YEqmtIZcAgAAiw4CAAAKdAIAAEjmA//+9ewA=
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:38:54 +0000
Message-ID: <2E06BF66-B436-4BFF-81E7-543CDB68E296@akamai.com>
References: <dd25161f-f8fc-0481-2d06-00907f4068fa@levkowetz.com> <E3D19227-79AF-477A-A929-8D54AAF63F9B@fugue.com> <daf8a9ee-3448-2d96-ec80-7c7553befec2@levkowetz.com> <78BF7E87-FE54-4512-B7CE-55CC6A4F3A68@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <78BF7E87-FE54-4512-B7CE-55CC6A4F3A68@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-28_07:2020-10-28, 2020-10-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=638 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010280100
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-28_07:2020-10-28, 2020-10-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=583 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010280100
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.18) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint1
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Really not a poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty please) ?
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "rsoc@iab.org" <rsoc@iab.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5919916444126689975=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>


  *   The argument for not having the tool do it is that the tool is provided by the IETF, and if the IETF-provided tool does it, its output will be (incorrectly) assumed to be canonical and used in non-IETF references to IETF documents. If the tool is not provided by the IETF, this won’t be an issue.

Do we think that organizations using RFC’s and doing “canonical references” to them are running xml2rfc?  I’m skeptical.

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email