Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan )

Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Mon, 03 June 2013 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9705C21F9843 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 06:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.411
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMRGC7T8E4xg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 06:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vsp-authed-01-02.binero.net (vsp-authed02.binero.net [195.74.38.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1367921F882A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 06:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.binero.se (unknown [195.74.38.28]) by vsp-authed-01-02.binero.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTP; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:36:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.50.38] (h79n2fls31o933.telia.com [212.181.137.79]) (Authenticated sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se) by smtp-06-01.atm.binero.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8838C3A1BC; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:36:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <51AC9BDF.2050404@omnitor.se>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:36:31 +0200
From: Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtpIEJheiBDYXN0aWxsbw==?= <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <51A65017.4090502@jitsi.org> <51A7BEBE.2040302@omnitor.se> <CALiegfk6XchF4U1Orpd6oJsydz-VGtBQ=CwaWrPa_KjsaQynYQ@mail.gmail.com> <51A7CD81.2060805@gmail.com> <51A835D7.9060603@omnitor.se> <CALiegfm4R=3mGqTOxBfvCfnsRg=fe=XapA6s-QQNjrsAkg5HEA@mail.gmail.com> <51A8F3EF.9080702@alum.mit.edu> <CALiegfkfz=qVM_wB21BBOypMTwTjkyG97zAmzHVpA6WHK2DA6w@mail.gmail.com> <51AC7D4F.6090708@omnitor.se> <CALiegfkxfb4qk+bS_EWbcxkNv-BSOwDw6eR-b86Z-hyMY60z3Q@mail.gmail.com> <51AC8547.1060400@omnitor.se> <CALiegfmeQtzAD_=6bPt77zNYC79iKjneycFS5RGssckNwSqptg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmeQtzAD_=6bPt77zNYC79iKjneycFS5RGssckNwSqptg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTT (was :No Plan )
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:37:20 -0000

On 2013-06-03 14:14, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2013/6/3 Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>se>:
>> The use cases draft includes a case titled:
>>
>> 4.2.10.  Simple video communication service with inter-operator calling
>>
>> See:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-10#page-9
> That will just work if both websites want to offer such a
> inter-website-communication. And that's already feasible. But we don't
> need a new standard (RTT-over-RTP) for allowing two users in different
> websites to intercommunicate via RTT. That can be achieved in multiple
> ways with existing technology (WebSocket, DataChannel) but, still,
> both websites must allow it.
The inter - operator communication is also described in the overview:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-06#section-3

It is because it can be done in multiple ways that we need a standard 
for it. And a standard that combines audio, video and real-time text in 
the same session.

Outside of that it is of course valuable to have 1000 other ways to do 
it. But that does not reduce the need for a standard.

/Gunnar


>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>