[TLS] Re: [EXT] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 17/04/2025 18:23, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote:
> Don’t try to stuff your perception of risks and correctness into
> everybody else’s throat.

Aside from the needlessly accusatory phrasing above, seeking to
reach consensus on the comparative riskiness of these seems like
a good plan to me, and entirely doable, so I disagree with you.

I also note that you earlier declined to get into the gory
detail of why you consider hybrids more risky. Arguing for
inclusion of text reflecting the details (gory or otherwise)
that have been aired in public seems entirely reasonable to
me, so if people who prefer one position over another aren't
willing to say why, they should IMO expect their positions
to be less well reflected in draft/RFC text.

Cheers,
S.