[TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com> Wed, 02 April 2025 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <neried7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37AA1666F1B for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BAhbbml97u-F for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A5B11666F14 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e5e8274a74so10710576a12.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743596251; x=1744201051; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zASNKkAIVnT4SFZB3kLorDI5Xil3Bjzr8mpJjQaYAuc=; b=iAi3059+5HbfPdybeXMaWHSdZTUidvCrS6uwyB6UXCObq45yYVfX0BeBWDP56MvuKV uFguuisJjZXJFTwnjx+PpSePv+/UDMk3gxHrpM4gM69dab3hhxE7DJMQ6ucicYGVpGUe uKAR5a2cSBP/4Vch+EDgPlX6AuNh26ooUirrJ3oz19gF2N/Otc2XWnBNP6irJX9vfJpG mF4Ww1e1WPSdTpknULIzlrLiDx/j9pqpuNnj6ITXy7Tw24foVWgc/OaecTI4Z6LxhvdM EF3hVh7RkwIC9HBHhYQ4DEqSRB33oeZoW1Z6ywRh580e6Xo7AogQ3vPwn+0gneZJLra/ hDlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743596251; x=1744201051; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zASNKkAIVnT4SFZB3kLorDI5Xil3Bjzr8mpJjQaYAuc=; b=lpArPEqsBK3TTWf9+mZ6NOOjv4mapn4XEsvyf38+f2i38ZWzvFppVzj7mrRwoFYaC3 XVreUaRpTPk0a5OboacrXL1OWfhPFd/5FtcZfUqTIxN6UGcX1VYy/10jMnSZVjqEG1bw WTs7J2CP5qww7r94mRouzSztfa/UMnqFUv2xXN0sEE4Ev5UfPJhK8c3M+Ec+jO3A0Jxv ZiLsXGsL3cfMIxy2D+ux3qgnYlaUAJqNKYLkiiXH0p+4A1AlFq9SUyEZ6589QOrQDw4l FVssdAnsZ9fGAXyr6LLrZwrI+0kPhVU5fMZDSJE8JRMp1yXtjVFH1CTXXCtK8VWbhgK/ 6afg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVZ2a/l4FXAZDpAxQ4A4AWYIZwVRH+DPUhyjDql0cnPoSHGY3etfQGBkpvPhXL8j+rqKYY=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzlQi0tiYlZ/YZU+Hehw2xcUUcyf+lS/EkyrXgI8PAvVdiuEoSB dMdjR/dBf/hGkvAe7n9gqQI5QN/FcLzhD1BNR0eHtp7NtE//dGqtE8afrDYql5qsoblOFU1Bd8W 4oaLvEDhrMUyMbZJhsbVjXvMPGH8=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncum4C8dMFLdkyPwLSSWo4ytvm0A3Qdz8ttnSPOjaX6X+BP5XY98yKhFVuETFj/ gB1hGD20GERytsVZVFx/Q+sqC6sVQ0sKjeUt1nIdS9iFZjS81YrI9bhoPfmxrqjz2b9nPVu/n2b Tzn/SWJFBAhpKV0K7XIC/cTP6e3vc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFEXZjrmqUBHJU2hvIZU5iI4SZERvwBqlAzoqNbe4iJ6S1VrslWDghSVLwD4XK1YgZ8MY3CDAFH7cZk3qcplXs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:430d:b0:5e5:ba77:6f24 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5edfd1235ddmr15250476a12.16.1743596250572; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 05:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <582917A1-F936-4A15-AE9D-342076605BE7@sn3rd.com> <f65014ed-9830-46ef-ad9e-4d9813b74f0c@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f65014ed-9830-46ef-ad9e-4d9813b74f0c@betaapp.fastmail.com>
From: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:17:19 -0400
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JqzspoClPw5eYyzVYWojJIMw7V-gpmruZ9d981tKJ6CShB0iBvzC1u7hv0
Message-ID: <CAFR824xfpOhaRbtbY1VXhbhFuE1uSsvcjihTR8h5QrD7qnyLCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000025af320631caa3c9"
Message-ID-Hash: N3LV2Q6K6RSJ3KT3J3TYFVGZV7VH6CK6
X-Message-ID-Hash: N3LV2Q6K6RSJ3KT3J3TYFVGZV7VH6CK6
X-MailFrom: neried7@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6ATuzoPpN1_BXMgfbs01OMzQQkE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

The IANA codepoints allocated in the current draft are all 'Recommended: N'

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 8:59 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> Like other pure ML-KEM uses, I am OK with adoption, though I might oppose
> Recommended: Y when it comes to that.  I also share John's concerns about
> key reuse, but would prefer to litigate that in the working group, rather
> than during adoption.
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, at 23:58, Sean Turner wrote:
> > We are continuing with our pre-announced tranche of WG adoption calls;
> > see [0] for more information. This time we are issuing a WG adoption
> > call for the ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3 I-D [1]. If
> > you support adoption and are willing to review and contribute text,
> > please send a message to the list. If you do not support adoption of
> > this draft, please send a message to the list and indicate why. This
> > call will close at 2359 UTC on 15 April 2025.
> >
> > In response to other WG adoption calls, Dan Bernstein pointed out some
> > potential IPR (see [2]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in
> > accordance with BCP 79.  Additional information is provided here; see
> > [3].
> >
> > BCP 79 makes this important point:
> >
> >   (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use
> >     technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides
> >     that such a use is warranted.
> >
> > WG members can take this information into account during this adoption
> > call to determine if we should adopt these drafts.
> >
> > Reminder:  This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the
> > mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Joe and Sean
> >
> > [0]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/
> > [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement/
> > [2]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mt4_p95NZv8duZIJvJPdZV90-ZU/
> > [3]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GKFhHfBeCgf8hQQvhUcyOJ6M-kI/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>