Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 17:33 UTC
Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC45421F8C04 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.889, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5aKpNmxPcgsr for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB4921F8BE9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; l=3280; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318959228; x=1320168828; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=rWfzJgUFGyPPwp2lsmgzSviFI1NNIIAbsEFVwsq6r2s=; b=YoBP1dTOeY/TyeOEiD6S6pmcmBlT9h6/ofKdWR3aiZNK26UyciIB2d8+ pEPfrrGHGyI0Uc1egVZLajFhaVDbg+z9mTEs9T/OSUQPLUtA2Rju8zQh1 wqqmuNiPwu34v0CqgM3jOYr2h2WkKXQK3YW2XIxwiVFTVD4Q5ezieKQUx g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArQAACy4nU6tJV2a/2dsb2JhbABEmT6PMIEFgW4BAQEEEgEdRAUMBAIBCBEEAQELBhcBBgFFAwEFCAEBBAESCAEZh2aYEwGeboc6YQSHUjCRLoxB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,366,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="29287065"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2011 17:33:47 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9IHXl85020315; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:33:47 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:33:46 -0500
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:33:45 -0500
Message-ID: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130AAE@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC0801@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AcyIu2t8cEmEfoUVRZO+1VXRKDAbdgE8IbWQAAF+JmAAAQcFQAABAmmg
References: <201110111355.p9BDt1M23806@ftpeng-update.cisco.com><282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local><1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com><750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F1FDCA4C3@crexc50p><282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7AB@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local><B06E5723-1EE5-4808-AE7F-3D98EB3F17CE@cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC07B7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130A41@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC0801@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org, pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2011 17:33:46.0860 (UTC) FILETIME=[172572C0:01CC8DBC]
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, Ullio Mario <mario.ullio@telecomitalia.it>, draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org, MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP <loic.meillarec@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:33:49 -0000
Dear Med, Sure, I do understand the need. However, if say Windows hosts from Microsoft do not support a PCP client, then the IPv6 CE router has no client PCP request to proxy/serve to the SP CGN. So is the CE router sniffing all unicast packets and inspecting ports in the packets to initiate PCP client requests from the CGN? A use case would be good to articulate. We will not forget during IESG review. It's a sentence to add to the IPv6 CE router document such as "The IPv6 CE router SHOULD/MUST support a PCP Proxy/server on LAN interface(s) and a PCP Client in the WAN interface." But the PCP base document needs to become a RFC ASAP. Even if we add a normative reference to the PCP-base I-D in the rfc6204bis document, the rfc6204bis will stall in the RFC Editor Queue waiting for PCP-base to become an RFC. I have guidance from the Chairs to try and send the rfc6204bis document to the IESG ASAP. Regards, Hemant -----Original Message----- From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:56 PM To: Hemant Singh (shemant); Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; Ullio Mario Subject: RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dear Hemant, Because we have the same pressure at the PCP front, including the PCP-requirements in the 6204bis is more safe IMHO. There is a risk to forget inserting appropriate text during the IESG review. Cheers, Med -----Message d'origine----- De : Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:shemant@cisco.com] Envoyé : mardi 18 octobre 2011 18:25 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP; Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Cc : v6ops@ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; Ullio Mario Objet : RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Mohamed, Thanks for your feedback. Please see this message I sent earlier on the PCP subject. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg10643.html Fred as Chair has one suggestion. During the IESG stage for the rfc6204bis document, we can consider adding PCP if PCP becomes an RFC by that timeframe. The IPv6 CE router document has its hands tied. I would work with the PCP and PCP proxy folks to get them to be RFC's ASAP. Regards, Hemant -----Original Message----- From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:41 AM To: Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; Ullio Mario Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dear Fred, all, As part of our DS-Lite deployment, PCP is a requirements for us. I strongly support including PCP in 6204bis. Note that PCP is not only about IPv4 service continuity but also about IPv6... Cheers, Med
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis fred
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Simon Perreault
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis christian.jacquenet
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Simon Perreault
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis François-Xavier Le Bail
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis christian.jacquenet
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Doug Barton
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Weil, Jason
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Maglione Roberta
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Wes Beebee
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Wes Beebee
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Alain Durand
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis christian.jacquenet
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Tina TSOU
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jared Mauch
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Dan Wing
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Jared Mauch
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis james woodyatt
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Washam Fan
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis SM
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis Lorenzo Colitti