IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EFC21F8BF4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.681
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.681 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.918, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0DrF8LeL1uFp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2564921F8AE1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; l=1182; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318955110; x=1320164710; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=4ya8T8EiyjjMVD+QdWB0Gzyx4YQI8eZHiVBIQktCtyk=; b=AN9rsdqTwT9u9egjiPHpWYvXPylCICDzdpLEraHTqbN38PSeCqT/oP2l Vmd8aNEP1q3JNMupy0tqqdFr/fj+y9QHIKlSKbzdu4xm5cnQJ9pWojeSL LtVtUUfJV+0OFHsw2ZGw6K/jzc5X7ame/vrPtP6kcr3zQHkXLlQ99GdsM 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArQAAJinnU6tJV2b/2dsb2JhbABEmT6PMIEFgW4BAQEEEgEdRAUMBAIBCBEEAQELBhcBBgFFCQgBAQQBEggBGYdmmDQBnnOHOmEEh1IwkS6MQQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,366,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="29238802"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2011 16:25:09 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9IGPCSO032716; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:25:12 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:25:09 -0500
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:25:08 -0500
Message-ID: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130A41@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC07B7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AcyIu2t8cEmEfoUVRZO+1VXRKDAbdgE8IbWQAAF+JmA=
References: <201110111355.p9BDt1M23806@ftpeng-update.cisco.com><282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local><1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com><750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F1FDCA4C3@crexc50p><282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7AB@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local><B06E5723-1EE5-4808-AE7F-3D98EB3F17CE@cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC07B7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org, pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2011 16:25:09.0151 (UTC) FILETIME=[80CCEAF0:01CC8DB2]
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, Ullio Mario <mario.ullio@telecomitalia.it>, draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org, MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP <loic.meillarec@orange.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:25:11 -0000

Mohamed,

Thanks for your feedback.  Please see this message I sent earlier on the PCP subject.

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg10643.html

Fred as Chair has one suggestion.  During the IESG stage for the rfc6204bis document, we can consider adding PCP if PCP becomes an RFC by that timeframe.   The IPv6 CE router document has its hands tied.  I would work with the PCP and PCP proxy folks to get them to be RFC's ASAP.

Regards,

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:41 AM
To: Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; Ullio Mario
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Dear Fred, all,

As part of our DS-Lite deployment, PCP is a requirements for us. I strongly support including PCP in 6204bis.

Note that PCP is not only about IPv4 service continuity but also about IPv6... 

Cheers,
Med

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email