Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259B021F8CCD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AGiJe6SoQEQz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078621F8C7B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=2718; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318343593; x=1319553193; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4av+ovtcQyzT0G0cey7oQbis9CRxT4M6devr3apzAVk=; b=GcQ+vAkFetIcC13tqGzeaReVg9VElxg/sQgZcA5lT1RRpyfLeIWgWuLa QjY6gPsXuqw5oD7ztZQxdHFDikjiWA7DadN7Sp9FkSTb6Y8u+5R1KF81a iNRPrFtZrPTQPkoWzRDKPk4XCOedzvjSAcnFv0GVVLt66U+TcaVXo9H+o o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAEtTlE6tJV2a/2dsb2JhbABDqCiBBYFTAQEBAwEBAQEPAVsLBQcECxEEAQEoBycfCQgGEyKHXAeaTwGeWoZrYQSTdYUojEY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,523,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="27544163"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2011 14:33:13 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (rtp-vpn1-443.cisco.com [10.82.225.187]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9BEX9Lg006929; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:33:10 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:33:11 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:33:11 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:32:42 -0400
Message-Id: <1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com>
References: <201110111355.p9BDt1M23806@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
To: Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:33:18 -0000

On Oct 11, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Maglione Roberta wrote:

> Hello,
> a question for the authors:
> Do you have any plan to include the requirements for PCP in this draft?

wearing the chair hat.

I'm not sure I detect a consensus behind the requirement for PCP. I personally would like to see it there, but I haven't heard a lot of commentary on that besides your request.

PCP is a protocol that would be used within the home to enable applications within the home to open holes in the firewall. The discussion at IETF-81 was that the characteristics of the LAN are now the province of homenet, and as such don't belong in this draft. This draft describes the characteristics of the CPE Router's WAN-facing side.

There is also an issue with PCP; it is currently a draft, and has not been sent to the IESG. Several operators have expressed some urgency for getting an RFC number on this so that they can include it in RFPs for managed routers. If we insert a normative reference to an internet draft, this cannot be published as an RFC until that draft is also published.

The working group can override me - if we see a number of operators asking for PCP to be mentioned in the draft, the authors will review that decision. But right now, that seems like a question for homenet.

> Thanks,
> Regards,
> Roberta
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of fred@cisco.com
> Sent: martedì 11 ottobre 2011 15.55
> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
> 
> 
> A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis. Please take a look at it and comment.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.
>