Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 26 September 2021 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4923A0D4F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J1D64r_k7zGq for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09AD53A0D4E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d21so40528616wra.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3fPw/wZ1lUxBAubCWW3c7T8kITEoDFjNqx8DR5FjAPU=; b=pC4A4AUwLoqq2ujNGZyA5Z82okSd9cxxbhgptuUf+M7NacRk5JmOPTpxl6NOqZbtAK bP3JUEMZVQsa5bfDpbSQ0LC76H7tiv35Wum1aJzD1+BYXRezDGPayFcNuN1JCg+vYt42 9n5Xm6m6n4JUcr8JWlrrcJPDN69CZQ7jJD7QB/ydrGQ/AohTuSG0sagGQLyadlOOAl41 APdVb82P3vA+hFxcdEp8UgNXVW6rv/84C9XwFi7RJ1tZiPKMdCEisdaLzLUGRmFW+mqE fWQhoUaE+3xCDnYKpSvzsF7Il6vssNWBxEQwPLNXpxpltrWi0hBG924ezMZRYxW5i3Mu SJJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3fPw/wZ1lUxBAubCWW3c7T8kITEoDFjNqx8DR5FjAPU=; b=waWaeKCXR/VeN9da6TDqeh0NppwYLQqJOaQXh3Sqqjq8M7aqsufe5d9BWPJflOVh7D ITsM7+eim+Y9u/Db/PrWTvaCoo1Ki/hwcZjzmpHKG6QmHSajgLIaqPGLv1qsspMiHCM8 q/PQLBNSJ8zOiTJzjZUY0Ycxmzv+qAPvGXCBIO0D4aILE5+fGtjeULu74Lg796Z+vWd+ SzXeqaOXUlRoWa9sHXA6GDxX8kAOJ1SGVWIfOHALH5jFAMjHQTsuZgcqd/QWv/wDqjCj 8mq80d944n8uQlO/HcX7zrRTHx4nUQBoZsjh5qQbuF9YHuwrMuaZJHg5sbneFKMPZxEA e4Ww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jaxAGPC4XGjftbP1yBW4cpG8/i6YiRn8t1RFhDxN56ea7MJmI L0jmWnGWg1D5JiuhbLQytkq/VCetvlaYCzndl1piXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzny4iA0xnazqeSSkqPIMJ/jmMEgg16EuDz53h0uRhK+60FY4X8q7saLjbb/S/z5jH3E4/7ouhfdLW0V6Vf9gs=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:63d2:: with SMTP id c18mr19646097wrw.311.1632634832516; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN-Dau2in52xSUkqKEXu=2AAiR4O_jLhna7hY-hshYDORfGtcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriWFp4JPtqDK5tEj1RkS-SzEfvscfUUnxgK+o6qP2pusRA@mail.gmail.com> <6E95834D-12B3-447B-8326-8EDE9DC6FFB1@delong.com> <CAO42Z2zA-4cK489nxKsWUN8vvU0eAiz-jS0e-_eWPg+OmP8wLw@mail.gmail.com> <DDA36020-90CC-471B-83AD-3D98950F1164@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDA36020-90CC-471B-83AD-3D98950F1164@delong.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 14:40:20 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2NGrgfkm5y9F_bEP9V6Ko9oGk7475r0dEKLKednX=ohg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, Jen Linkova <furry@google.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e6d9805ccdf6ba8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ITqVORyZMmO6lMRjM7a3HRKf8do>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:40:41 -0000

If you have NAC you don't need DHCPv6 for anything. RFC 7934 section 9.1.

On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 4:44 PM Owen DeLong <owen=
40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> DHCP by itself, no.
>
> DHCP+NAC, well, yes… yes it does.
>
> You see, with NAC (Network Admission Control), you don’t get on the
> network unless and/or until
> you’ve properly completed the 802.1x authentication process and part of
> that includes (potentially)
> requiring you to have an address that the DCHP server will vouch for being
> tied to your DUID and/or
> MAC address.
>
> So while the article you site is sort of correct to some extent as far as
> it goes, it presumes a set
> of limitations on the network that isn’t true for many enterprise networks.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On Sep 25, 2021, at 00:08 , Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2021, 12:55 Owen DeLong, <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Now if they could only implement DHCPv6.
>>
>
> What problem would that solve?
>
> It won't solve the problem of recording IPv6 addresses in use:
>
>
> https://ipv6tao.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-stateful-dhcpv6-myth-no-it-doesnt.html
>
>
>
>
>> Owen
>>
>>
>> On Sep 24, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My understanding is that Android supports
>> <https://cs.android.com/android/_/android/platform/packages/modules/NetworkStack/+/70d7ffa59f1f4ac242d8409143108466025102c7>
>> handling PREF64 RA options.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:21 AM David Farmer <farmer=
>> 40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Are there and host or router implementations of PREF64 (RFC8781) out in
>>> the wild yet?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ===============================================
>>> David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
>>> Networking & Telecommunication Services
>>> Office of Information Technology
>>> University of Minnesota
>>> 2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
>>> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
>>> ===============================================
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list
>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>