IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 13 October 2021 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEA43A05DF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2e53qI9JJ_lR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7C0C3A0B38 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1634144162; x=1665680162; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=0xxZbQ7PfMELw/wwq1LsAHyBqJcnNdVRSfvSmFjcgQI=; b=IgyJvFNBAHpgcoMwixaoNuIpXEFdWJ/D49PGnYf5+v0WFlCg13QxnVsN LteFse7B8BIGiLSpdfMflelwk8eM0oLtGvCHiGEn9hJrfBVx9kw5B8q8l Hm4zC1XDrNFoYTAvnP07BUm7hfjP4QtLozsETYuVAM8sVQ5ltZfxBuiF2 CmVoVUe6mAWvgSfbjbjbyeVBR9FA0SCEXHfYw78m8+P2/pFiBB4Lvy5Ch ZG+yktphJs8npwpNj7i1B9d3pyXMlgxIuQ4P+A/QF1W7BTg42NIu8GTGb JG3b9ff2eTRU6dyCBaSNlyxfE5nZXu1GrGwZ5u6Tl5t++Tc855qiyhXKB Q==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2021 18:55:56 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37874245E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6681940EC4; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 64A20126F88; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YWcPm49GzkJZDYTP@Space.Net>
References: <CAKD1Yr34jv_N0jGKdg=sG76oGU7PdRjYFC_-w9Uvzs=7oGm38w@mail.gmail.com> <E6316781-AC7D-438F-B216-75B1DF9217DC@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr10OKMJ1y8bs5xpt6jS8ZWsqs66oFCXmp-QLySS5Yn4hg@mail.gmail.com> <5DF8D1AE-4B54-429F-962A-488F2AA1F895@delong.com> <CAPt1N1ma45GKqXcvjHUGCYFKVbEGp3OuT013pZhrnOkFFLMiQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2Pe+=tNkA7Ou9KeMkgFhcdSb8WxgVn1w9MauusMEhRcw@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB4881076DFF8A145C8CD818B8D8B69@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <A188D974-3CEB-497F-93EA-B66C77D2CA90@delong.com> <YWW1ghmjueHmfCEb@Space.Net> <2D28AB77-CA86-4289-A2F1-7DFCC6FB0597@delong.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sEa0KeImTx3BWIcm"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2D28AB77-CA86-4289-A2F1-7DFCC6FB0597@delong.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4WuWP2DlIYPAXTeU_UXLlO2jV0U>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 16:56:47 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:28:54PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > I strongly dislike the implications of "any larger site that has a wifi
> > network needs to have a /52 provisioned, so thousands of wifi clients
> > can have a /64 *each*" on address space management on all layers.
> 
> Agreed??? A /48 is a much better choice than a /52.

For most deployments it is plain not possible to reserve a /48 for "WiFi",
if all they have is a /48 for a whole "site".

Thinking we have arbitrary number of /64s to burn will have a hard landing
when reality comes along.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email