IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Is there a problem? [was: Why enterprises aren't adopting IPv6]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 30 September 2021 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6AD3A0FB3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C57u3ag9AEep for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A737A3A103B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id q23so5892394pfs.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t0/fDF88oZOPWLqS5oN1/uBGf1JaB3TwrBmIatqOmvU=; b=PmEH73ivnVig3zfoZ2s/oIYARCsIrd4BsXtd27Yt8GRu4CrZO1W+HOMSOOA28RkYvW 2/JUDdGRB7P+GUM6q/CykT9gTo+duWhmQGh8qxsAKpfbnZGgM97isoUrTaJddLLOycsK KiLEfq9u6Vy+kUuTVvQoHx3ANu0NMIqEcWi/Db83h0XQwjtlkZugjcMwZZnnYvPfqu9K qq+MBMllQtIAwYXHYAd3yT4axq4uRfS3Qu+AFlMtBaoKSvIkJ9aACghMGIss3Q0Fscf5 /XMTwS1hdW3t65waBV028SIe0KO++evqgMn67s8pJm7RxRCiyv5uZq+7X2rn1Y+qImsh i6pA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=t0/fDF88oZOPWLqS5oN1/uBGf1JaB3TwrBmIatqOmvU=; b=g+fw9+7vMpJYbWLNXV1AgxMP3dfbx2FtKBTeCfQvH46iXN3Ry5zMIopSUDIldvBshq 4aebl0an/iQUbnlYlNYf2esUltxpMklKoDJW0I0D/fqP7Oyy/onuMiNNyXAlfVws6FQf FgPV3IIQtVjDI8YqNPJB3ERk6XVbnwsfcC73mQFIFu6hm7XWhRuMREDlVQsadlIkvPa2 OjEsYVjPVuHiK0JY7hpQzLsgtlWkVDKNnDS9Qgnx2Yn6r4dow8DW3C+LfnIluHO2cgd+ nzncIae7TrwqzcJEy6xaZjjpheI/pFooyW+vkd8bGzZiFwZqkWlIp1zUv1w+zwBvQkQ8 Sxuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531RsbdWx7nuLsMLU1dqqQUAlriWJ3PhfK6+b+EVQwjFniGC8od/ ss7MM1dU4HOAE+YbMe66FK4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIcvbVvRIZLkeAdGqLPGCKstMx1myRIs3D9arYo5fS7D/GOjPbs2REZBPF0UfwR17Xbl56gA==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:93c9:0:b0:43c:f4f5:aac2 with SMTP id y9-20020aa793c9000000b0043cf4f5aac2mr5858011pff.11.1633030367723; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v12sm3243753pjd.9.2021.09.30.12.32.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: otroan@employees.org, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry@google.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Owen DeLong <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CAO42Z2wdoSdJDOB2Zo0=ZK0ecOARRsdg2nbHZGSDOhryPbLfDw@mail.gmail.com> <F2BD0A42-E9AD-45DD-999A-638E73BE1177@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2K3Gd3JD=NJFOoH6GYgs-8ACxRQB9-sKJ7cbF4_hxsow@mail.gmail.com> <0B533C71-5DB0-410D-A5A3-7E8FD559F214@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr3NoYfNT7+OVJoCCdgdif6AHHw29tNCPttS=-NuRZKv3w@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB692426B0EEDDC2C4D78D8EC0C3A89@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr25dtinLBeJpAuJ17NfLg7-ewM9QPvnXNuEJ8wiBQV9ig@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2zqf=F6OTDK2e8cMYXdPgMZ=SgFJcn7BTKYGgcYsLT2iw@mail.gmail.com> <894BCFE9-0811-4AE6-9941-6183292E4431@delong.com> <7E8C5F52-596F-4CAB-89EB-B0D5BAF5F612@employees.org> <YVXvgS6GDX97sHOW@Space.Net> <4AF3C29B-4642-4173-A027-0AAAEE65C869@employees.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <71a223dd-1f92-a397-0f26-7d6032377787@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:32:42 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AF3C29B-4642-4173-A027-0AAAEE65C869@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KAeA0bL94F9oen48R05YWVzUvZw>
Subject: [v6ops] Is there a problem? [was: Why enterprises aren't adopting IPv6]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 19:32:54 -0000

On 01-Oct-21 06:21, otroan@employees.org wrote:
> Gert,
> 
>>> typically they only use a 1/65535th of an IPv4 address ((one TCP port) although they share it at L7).
>>> it would certainly be possible to improve on that.
>>
>> Is that our goal?
> 
> No, but our goal failed. So let's take stock.

We designed for co-existence, despite calling it "transition".

We have co-existence, and no drop-dead date for IPv4.

Why is this a problem?

   Brian

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status