Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (was Re: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)

"Bill Fenner" <fenner@fenron.com> Tue, 29 July 2008 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <72attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 72attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-72attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0B03A6B49; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 72attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0043A6B49 for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.77
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.77 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWE+oe-JDMlT for <72attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146143A69DF for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so3957437wah.25 for <72attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.56.1 with SMTP id e1mr5610222waa.204.1217289805849; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.74.4 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54e226890807281703v2ab3caf4yaf769727200ba2a3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:03:25 +0100
From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner@fenron.com>
To: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <94A3C924-DB32-43B1-B9F5-66C54EA32926@muada.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <C4B41B20.76FCE%jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <94A3C924-DB32-43B1-B9F5-66C54EA32926@muada.com>
Cc: 72attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [72attendees] Clarifying Host Responsibilities (was Re: Guestroom Network not under NOC Control)
X-BeenThere: 72attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 72 meeting." <72attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/72attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:72attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees>, <mailto:72attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 72attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
<iljitsch@muada.com> wrote:
> I find this a rather condescending attitude ...

Iljitsch,

  That's a lot to say, given how condescending you were less than 24
hours ago regarding how stupid we must be to rate limit the traffic.

  Bill
_______________________________________________
72attendees mailing list
72attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/72attendees