IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 22 August 2019 06:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96EBF120100 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LSRsQPqDj_Y for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BDD120059 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id n19so3653300lfe.13 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HuHH9UC/010Qey2up0iTngq9PLTDpvfmkBIGYTH46Bg=; b=Y8ESP5mW8GTt/UW71ucqXn96zXKZ2WZo0ko51x/kMs8pbCHusRA1PqTf9Sl/VCPkt8 wLSpktfmpgLI4maID4287iUKlivMs38ZUf0QloUoz6Gq0AjJdS9YjE4/3qCl2pK4rGVl 91UG9/WBzfha8DiLxvYWlFQqnIQgLHVMo/uvqGkh4HhS6pM6NuqKI2h5UAr/l3kk6jRM ywnM2zniZOqQw0+OUaxMBqhZjVUA9xRaXAL/0dY/aZWjMql9zjp5QCW5Y4lhGT+Bsx8C 2clSGqeevJtvRfl5jXTtPDvPs236BzAe7otY32ctfgHYeiD9Pj22qKN2uKmXOvKiGAW8 9TLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HuHH9UC/010Qey2up0iTngq9PLTDpvfmkBIGYTH46Bg=; b=DnmB1Fl1fLGTvjxBOP6tWit8f5WR+bHny3raVfcEPyoFAHCWnRsJ+d4sNyjf1/tOYB 1cMFlagcHJXqWanYppXGLUEeUx1HWKoxETpRa4N+omZtTkfZywCrVLesqHz7WEzH1B5z TBJFlNtqrxqOrufpOnCO+ocWJ5CHDsDiIW1mqLxOXYVA3YuY1+yriWvgIkqFWVpMOlx+ wyagxfqxnTxXijRWl+1+oHHnXPloZwmUHjjgaS6Evo2vJ4k/NX16dNF3Ai5SI2omgyIF hUtlibVxmMqsHydaYqx3+sVktQ+btyAVpE6s2RcFNWtBawbdfGZ6VxxJKo3V/DdoUNrW 5KiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7I5IxLvFNZ8VQ0zZWbAdrWqTaPL85nWF+H94gIy7yInNDp5W8 vPb8Aw6Mg0V9OfkNauAi2gArWT75eLQ0++kHRrFXuA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxsv8e6aQ+G3zmZWi9bHJYwJmzvbbvFfrO90fJ8jCLS/rDPvkKoXf0JYHuGJKINaGEBL8ljUBruYQ90/1rkwms=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1da:: with SMTP id f26mr20775554lfp.129.1566456267617; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A1128702-1E19-4657-9740-E84AE09992F2@piuha.net> <CABcZeBMfOTjq-8hDDoKMtJvfHUA5nC8o60zuk-2Xe-ZhfwriJQ@mail.gmail.com> <766112E1-F532-4C6B-8CA8-A096671E02EE@piuha.net> <CABcZeBO1nqtSOn8hmcC58Ys5rC9=fXLPQhWStgWL0oSfMQ072g@mail.gmail.com> <a250ce7e-db59-8b74-3ac7-9c5d751b1cb8@bellis.me.uk> <CABcZeBMmAqsRwA1YwdzCyRT_tNzkHEDe3u916c7KhWWBeKqPkg@mail.gmail.com> <b48d7314-e931-1543-30bc-0b2602f1daab@bellis.me.uk> <CABcZeBOMPreon+Tn8BUB0DZF-sAg8ijH-vFFf7kjSg1MhZH+Eg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCirY_=nqEt3ETT_9th0q3ErVykhuCfGtihjum7U0PWVWDA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCirY_=nqEt3ETT_9th0q3ErVykhuCfGtihjum7U0PWVWDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:43:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNciBE8S+Nba2_wWRDx=4k+UoX3_cmeH_rywz1jdHwP_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Cc: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000634d2c0590af05bd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/0IpOGk6aS73ZWqgCM1VNIZuGZ1Y>
Subject: Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 06:44:32 -0000

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:26 PM Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:15 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 6:05 PM Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Or Mozilla could embrace DNSSEC and DoT thereby encouraging their
>>> deployment for the benefit of all internet users...
>>>
>>
>> I feel like everything meaningful to be said about DNSSEC has already
>> been said, so I'll spare people that.
>>
>
> Actually, there is one thing you could say about DNSSEC that would help
> clarify Mozilla's position.
>
> Basically, without doing validation, a stub resolver can be categorized
> two different ways:
>
>    - security-unaware stub resolver
>    - security-aware non-validating stub resolver
>
> I think it would be helpful if Mozilla were to state which kind of stub
> resolver it will be implementing (security-unaware or security-aware).
>

Are these defined somewhere? If so, can you send a pointer?

-Ekr



> In either case, a validating resolver will return RCODE=2 if validation
> fails, so I think it doesn't have any practical impact.
>
> Brian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email