Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 23 August 2019 04:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC9B12003F for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlAQgWdwDO5L for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260BC120091 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id x3so6165379lfc.0 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3/gLHty8RFHkLEvxJ0Uj9G7ntePG+ApUBNf/FUN5WEw=; b=Wd2JtJVb8ze3VHKqQqX8jOBj3iMz5DKRTnShR6nLB7KSK+U4Nb4U/I1G+yFE+jxNCO yYqscQjhcEHo8DB/00yuY4r6JErD/X7XCfRbUZ9F8mT/LBPj1IY9fKlMpBZN2t7rm1hq 7C2NMftjFAXXRqwaADWFRGbzkqhDAJOQ5PGWosC+g+otxU9yKC/wE8wF9qVojNnEJqV1 7j9QIFJbuyNzdYyH72exNPZEbdqrphYKLtMzJAD90QsyFbCqCm1fU2SICKhA7DzWokuc 7R8kh3xcrm7EDjUDotavqLZqBEIVU9uDyB2qf9cXJvtAtprPOZAz59ymLLKw4Z2ohveP Ciyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3/gLHty8RFHkLEvxJ0Uj9G7ntePG+ApUBNf/FUN5WEw=; b=qb8/pO6BZeCrTk6CU02orsrl4nEK+4DTIw4LuEDhETR/zJcweF4UytF1J21ixcATSV 33EyTjnDzXwGmx7G0cC2hswIn7QsacvFcr9nP7aaeKqII9XVb0yb8e213r+wyQEJgpsW W3xRoGu6kljIikOTrEbj0qwqo1QritGMidS2XrEXr481bpW3NM0jZ72uyONmxtrAEItQ IInAYPlTGf/7gdixpCuVGScnelGM0Ueh7uXL8yyE7tjWJuMQO/Mltjxw8JIz4oMHG0Yl 7KrZ4oWxccP8kMigX9ZczX3vYxbDp7DIvwykS7pDpKdV/KMSnbGfYSBgDf2bM6nI3qYO G2Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXALHEEEmbH0LlpB94QTjXH0K2FmbZc/GWkfdb8UCKBDc1hMSMV NUKN6TcHlPDpPfnw7zDiSk1oPcg909NBERGD4YNQjg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjYJau4W7vfYD5be+HylU+BirtTRq/e/bLTonGRXOuvAYAyQ8eBSomFahRhuABKaSyZVZnxHRl33Us+B0qN/s=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5336:: with SMTP id f22mr1441492lfh.180.1566534758382; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A1128702-1E19-4657-9740-E84AE09992F2@piuha.net> <CABcZeBMfOTjq-8hDDoKMtJvfHUA5nC8o60zuk-2Xe-ZhfwriJQ@mail.gmail.com> <766112E1-F532-4C6B-8CA8-A096671E02EE@piuha.net> <CABcZeBO1nqtSOn8hmcC58Ys5rC9=fXLPQhWStgWL0oSfMQ072g@mail.gmail.com> <a250ce7e-db59-8b74-3ac7-9c5d751b1cb8@bellis.me.uk> <CABcZeBMmAqsRwA1YwdzCyRT_tNzkHEDe3u916c7KhWWBeKqPkg@mail.gmail.com> <7893F89E-ACB5-42EF-B8B6-5CF460FA5D0E@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <7893F89E-ACB5-42EF-B8B6-5CF460FA5D0E@fl1ger.de>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 05:32:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOR4kp6iyXCDwswiKw5co+=Ak18fM5YPRjF5cUZ9Yp2nQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
Cc: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cd4f1a0590c14b12"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/PIYrhpo23OPdB2_w9acOxD76IO0>
Subject: Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:32:42 -0000

On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:12 PM Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> wrote:

> Moin!
>
> On 21 Aug 2019, at 19:01, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > Indeed: this is what I was referring to when I said "ways to minimize
> > centralization". Specifically, ISPs could commit to strong privacy
> policies
> > and join our TRR program.
> A lot of ISPs have way stronger privacy policies then the TRR program, yet
> they can not join because it’s impossible to fulfil the other requirements
>

Interesting. I'd be interested in seeing links to those privacy policies.


and IMHO bad decsisions in the TRR program what to require and what not:
> - No DNSSEC
>

I don't see how us not requiring DNSSEC precludes ISPs joining


- But qname minimisation that breaks stuff and for larger resolvers adds
> not much
> - Requirement to publish block lists
>

I think we've explained our reasons for these, and we're not yet persuaded
that relaxing them would be a good thing.

-Ekr




>
> So long
> -Ralf
> ---
> Ralf Weber
>