Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 22 August 2019 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DABA120B48 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ewvvAaGhVeIy for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2205120B34 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DtwJ4ZxTzFZ9; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:53:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1566500016; bh=ZiIFbbu3DeLITX8DMMX6ycNGF8FD1/GDcQ8u4fP6x24=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Eu4v8vHHg17iPW+fdliYSyE6OoH8ktxg/CbQzbhEMRoEqhly0Gy52gsgMypVOATTb ElW2IjWsa5W/IlYaADKlMj79fElFK96g7gnxYckhjmW7c2zYNcvRS6T6VW1AYg1VTQ QE3G+/AT/93o0DCScEcUwFwSksAUFOCVgBv2GY2k=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwV_mOntZaBN; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:53:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:53:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.110] (104-195-254-115.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.195.254.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86E1B59CFFF; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:53:31 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 86E1B59CFFF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G77)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPtU5nStN3KhsmjbXRKuQ57BM30-ip7CqF-xjRCkZCSWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:53:30 -0400
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E26456F7-2433-47A8-9E76-28B28A44C3DD@nohats.ca>
References: <A1128702-1E19-4657-9740-E84AE09992F2@piuha.net> <CABcZeBMfOTjq-8hDDoKMtJvfHUA5nC8o60zuk-2Xe-ZhfwriJQ@mail.gmail.com> <766112E1-F532-4C6B-8CA8-A096671E02EE@piuha.net> <CA+9kkMAfuOwJu8_qJTuhAY4mUwR+tVUxr+k3QFHBk3byV672Ow@mail.gmail.com> <E83D9594-E7CB-4DAC-8EDC-333E9B0964F1@piuha.net> <279abf8c-198b-5da8-1cb9-4f86bf1f37c7@nostrum.com> <D547C79F-771D-41CC-B86E-3B08140FB7BC@piuha.net> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908220921190.4312@tvnag.unkk.fr> <87C8E6E6-2DEE-4637-9C86-65B27615611C@piuha.net> <CABcZeBPtU5nStN3KhsmjbXRKuQ57BM30-ip7CqF-xjRCkZCSWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/g4HpPpLGOm0cs8FNCOhOcbFBoCE>
Subject: Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 18:53:43 -0000

> On Aug 22, 2019, at 06:26, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I agree that there is a risk, but given that we know that the current design *also* has a high risk of surveillance and other leaks, and that in fact those sorts of things regularly occur, this doesn't seem to me to be anywhere near as strong an argument as you seem to think it is. 

As a non-US citizen, I strongly disagree that the argument that we are putting all eggs in US baskets is not a strong argument. The US government formally gives me 0 expectation of privacy and they dictate policy to US entities. It is worse informally as we’ve seen time and time again (echelon, Snowden etc).

While I understand you might feel okay with your government’s policies to protect your privacy please remain aware that is a very privileged position to be in.

Paul