IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Thu, 22 August 2019 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B1D1200C7 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eKm2BOy5o5n9 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (www.haxx.se [IPv6:2a00:1a28:1200:9::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1961201A3 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 00:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (mail [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id x7M7OvtF000968 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:24:57 +0200
Received: from localhost (dast@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x7M7OvuZ000950; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:24:57 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: giant.haxx.se: dast owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:24:57 +0200
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, add@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <D547C79F-771D-41CC-B86E-3B08140FB7BC@piuha.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1908220921190.4312@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <A1128702-1E19-4657-9740-E84AE09992F2@piuha.net> <CABcZeBMfOTjq-8hDDoKMtJvfHUA5nC8o60zuk-2Xe-ZhfwriJQ@mail.gmail.com> <766112E1-F532-4C6B-8CA8-A096671E02EE@piuha.net> <CA+9kkMAfuOwJu8_qJTuhAY4mUwR+tVUxr+k3QFHBk3byV672Ow@mail.gmail.com> <E83D9594-E7CB-4DAC-8EDC-333E9B0964F1@piuha.net> <279abf8c-198b-5da8-1cb9-4f86bf1f37c7@nostrum.com> <D547C79F-771D-41CC-B86E-3B08140FB7BC@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/1ZoYn1I1AsV_Z0Z3XZX02zi1dus>
Subject: Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 07:25:05 -0000

On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, Jari Arkko wrote:

> they are unlikely to do anything else than to accept the recommended default 
> option. Or understand what the implications of the different options are. My 
> mom will be in this group, and I care about what privacy settings she gets.

This argumentation assumes that the "default" your mom should get is the 
default that is dictated by the coffee shop owner whose wifi she connects to. 
I don't think that's a given. I don't think DHCP is a default that we must 
live with until the end of times.

Privacy? Which is better? Do53 to a server handed out over DHCP or DoH to 
another server? There's not a single answer to this, it depends on who you are 
and what you believe in.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email