Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Wed, 21 August 2019 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093E5120E3B for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-s8KhqtSlGV for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa29.google.com (mail-vk1-xa29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AFC6120E40 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa29.google.com with SMTP id z67so806942vkd.5 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HT8mmlMYOS05qCL2wby67lIMPMnHbUgqmJT5Cyry8+0=; b=d8KLebHpHGrefN+X3KWaNJacuYb83b1Mdo9qcrQbrgjnPkRGoYCGzIXXE5z2hBo3QV gXWxZVt0xHy0zEz+/J/WJVKlKMuqv5wZlW0tIdVMY5++pNTk5/DmsCcLGSLnnuhZSagL DqR0kYNiWBFxWSfoUHLz+A6kQOdYfMdbtx4vt5RxnSr82Wc8iNajsDVyMDRMpIl8fLMX mNwgptz4gRJ/NLCdjpCuuKtwlSihYKGvcS/9hwO3kFZgVU8Dk12AP6UJraHJEZuset2a rhrvRs1nVS3k4YQrvJ6p/cQP/OOP6rg7tDhcBu6KZmmfY4GCkRblHlhl2DMXTtNiEyKW 9thQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HT8mmlMYOS05qCL2wby67lIMPMnHbUgqmJT5Cyry8+0=; b=ulxjgwEnEnpsz96wGWCK+c0+dzcyj4eVK3eiWoA+glL/breNfTd5KwHz/GCCdfRsqj 6YJ04h/YzviOqQ2gUsZ+2gl3mSn5sPBw4GDXePJGSY3c3HBIHcQkvPm2d4EbBPRdWS/y hzg7bfdN4uAC/rMp1oMikqMCPHF82V0D7oQPIQPmUhC1LSL4AU/y9urgRMVOrhlAXZ2G rUXrNxUK8W99gZ+FK7c0/hRF+SoZjmJVNTaQziLwkSyrGxO46L0OavpfKKSVjWAH+0iz ZefeAm3qdfAahUrWGkZes/+VeimiJU9TT4bWO6u64NBkhWiuUWaxpCvcGBraZncrMt2N t8rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXjDVzDwVsIqOYxN/0ksSzxhcnrRPifXsqGmW8Bdm1DkBoEyECc DULJfP4HS1QF6AoBneIkjsvJXfVi4T7Hx38EoShyFAXq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzB2aA8p5OTcdlAdHHxDY9WeVgB/bEcnIlII1tUOaUqldh5qeoe3FEox20lwp6hPtDDVf68R8Dl+6xFaprouYc=
X-Received: by 2002:ac5:cc4d:: with SMTP id l13mr3639480vkm.72.1566411992039; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A1128702-1E19-4657-9740-E84AE09992F2@piuha.net> <CABcZeBMfOTjq-8hDDoKMtJvfHUA5nC8o60zuk-2Xe-ZhfwriJQ@mail.gmail.com> <766112E1-F532-4C6B-8CA8-A096671E02EE@piuha.net> <CABcZeBO1nqtSOn8hmcC58Ys5rC9=fXLPQhWStgWL0oSfMQ072g@mail.gmail.com> <a250ce7e-db59-8b74-3ac7-9c5d751b1cb8@bellis.me.uk> <CABcZeBMmAqsRwA1YwdzCyRT_tNzkHEDe3u916c7KhWWBeKqPkg@mail.gmail.com> <b48d7314-e931-1543-30bc-0b2602f1daab@bellis.me.uk> <CABcZeBOMPreon+Tn8BUB0DZF-sAg8ijH-vFFf7kjSg1MhZH+Eg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOMPreon+Tn8BUB0DZF-sAg8ijH-vFFf7kjSg1MhZH+Eg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:26:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH1iCirY_=nqEt3ETT_9th0q3ErVykhuCfGtihjum7U0PWVWDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005b86f30590a4b64b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/YjUwYBAv3kSDuUNsURZEdcm18U8>
Subject: Re: [Add] What to do in this potential working group
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:26:36 -0000

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:15 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 6:05 PM Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Or Mozilla could embrace DNSSEC and DoT thereby encouraging their
>> deployment for the benefit of all internet users...
>>
>
> I feel like everything meaningful to be said about DNSSEC has already been
> said, so I'll spare people that.
>

Actually, there is one thing you could say about DNSSEC that would help
clarify Mozilla's position.

Basically, without doing validation, a stub resolver can be categorized two
different ways:

   - security-unaware stub resolver
   - security-aware non-validating stub resolver

I think it would be helpful if Mozilla were to state which kind of stub
resolver it will be implementing (security-unaware or security-aware).

In either case, a validating resolver will return RCODE=2 if validation
fails, so I think it doesn't have any practical impact.

Brian