Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 20 December 2016 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADFD12956D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:46:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THBWJTXuC52i for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CFD129430 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.60.60] (50-1-51-163.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id uBKIk48m007472 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:46:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-163.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.163] claimed to be [10.32.60.60]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:46:40 -0800
Message-ID: <E6401D03-04D9-4884-ABC7-022C2E763B0C@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161220174650.GA884@server.ds9a.nl>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org> <8f78a52b-01ae-f529-a1ec-d7eb90fe94be@bellis.me.uk> <6EBB4C5C-E2D9-40B9-86B8-03614804282D@vpnc.org> <20161220174650.GA884@server.ds9a.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5310)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/B5hW_2zXWVq12j4mSsJ6p5OTWPA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:46:43 -0000

On 20 Dec 2016, at 9:46, bert hubert wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:43:25AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On 20 Dec 2016, at 8:35, Ray Bellis wrote:
>>
>>> The document primarily covers BIND's behaviour.
>>
>> Noted. That seems like a good reason for ISC to document it.
>
> No it doesn't. It also documents the exact PowerDNS behaviour.

PowerDNS can document it, or can point to the ISC documentation.

> RPZ is a
> standard, even if it isn't an RFC yet.

It is statements like this which show that this WG working on this as an 
"Informational RFC" is dishonest and is sure to lead to massive 
dissatisfaction with the result.

> It interoperates extensively.

Good!

> Unbound is also slated to have support for RPZ.

Unbound can document it or point to the ISC documentation.

--Paul Hoffman