Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> Tue, 20 December 2016 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AD0129DC0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:47:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gI5kzR_L19p2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com (tmpmail.powerdns.com [128.199.32.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DB4129C35 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900C76C7EF; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:46:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tmpmail.powerdns.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXQQRiH127p9; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:46:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from server.ds9a.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:bba::42]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B046C7ED; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:46:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: by server.ds9a.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F740AC2DCE; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:46:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:46:50 +0100
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <20161220174650.GA884@server.ds9a.nl>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org> <8f78a52b-01ae-f529-a1ec-d7eb90fe94be@bellis.me.uk> <6EBB4C5C-E2D9-40B9-86B8-03614804282D@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6EBB4C5C-E2D9-40B9-86B8-03614804282D@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/CF5ZftcuesHaMVac_4ndXwVuB48>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:47:28 -0000

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:43:25AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2016, at 8:35, Ray Bellis wrote:
> 
> >The document primarily covers BIND's behaviour.
> 
> Noted. That seems like a good reason for ISC to document it.

No it doesn't. It also documents the exact PowerDNS behaviour. RPZ is a
standard, even if it isn't an RFC yet. It interoperates extensively.

Unbound is also slated to have support for RPZ.

	Bert