Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9FA1296B2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:55:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0D4NM74GgE1Q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:55:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21AE4129568 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:55:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c47so207976246qtc.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:55:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=F7cDn0ELInLUoubZtkawGNgckqad7wk6VFhwUCwrT6A=; b=caBKqn1gvPfr9N+nw9Zu48wpoCRQ7anyWJveNLWDaLR3foicIB5Wj9XhJ6dfkgX9OD OH8npU/4fTqdztgMXTakS3DU94uopdzGhsaUlidS36tfrLeIyMz28rV4dYfHwd2bTMmc WNCrh52zPW1C02jldwYDxH2CQAj9Ybyu/sR2OAlEgp6pIfylj3tzB+RFgjl0VZD8p20v gexlFBE9OfzGJhOpBPzyjitYhVzSgucZlyWrLhX0TG/4NZK+425RJUNJ9DRBWDV2Kyit kIrPNag5kj/tECBim4r/44h8KKQWnQi/P3p0zm6dHScBofQfhapVbWDWA2yTFHKED+hs nP3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=F7cDn0ELInLUoubZtkawGNgckqad7wk6VFhwUCwrT6A=; b=N/tgvmFsuacUfYwO55VjGTcZKg39llqxDDAki0xwPIWm1CW0zWPNVnf7cs7yy1/web Lc0ENYIyUaDzKepgrb6YN1Hgb33SzEyd6IICkTJ8AyT7yqk693012+0FRmEqggvDsQYy mJZm25sYeQV2nzvAwHVxRU0xr1THB74VUHBog/l4H8uyspNW2LoQ64ssx/YosOqt15GC ApL33e4dVZ5DCNL7A0td4h3FCrVfKhwIf73Dyemmzn0t3VnYC8HrwrR06Idf3enF087H RqJRLkfOrBwHDPDbXdfYr1xFCATgME4JaUxMk5t28m4qzOlY+C1w+nwq8vdlqYqmO+SI jiLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLlSuGUwaE7mW7ISogBsqNIRFnSs8BWaKd63CsbTm7pHgkGpCpMCVT/ncZ/zdGLZA==
X-Received: by 10.200.35.250 with SMTP id r55mr5386612qtr.161.1482332104269; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.229] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c198sm15659888qka.48.2016.12.21.06.55.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:55:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <449F48B1-7D99-4185-9683-53ADDBD8D04F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_770D6557-9C98-4479-A751-F8747E678F85"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:55:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CACfw2hj4VfuqsM-jRpxNc+bWNsUcSid+Y=r9U5jsA-0ZLbLRUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <C18E2D4E-EE89-4AF6-B4A0-FAD1A7A01B5E@vpnc.org> <5248A099-7E1F-437A-A1B7-C300F917D273@fl1ger.de> <CACfw2hj4VfuqsM-jRpxNc+bWNsUcSid+Y=r9U5jsA-0ZLbLRUg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DQheLW246GRrLiUJ0toyX_zl-uQ>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:55:06 -0000

On Dec 21, 2016, at 9:36 AM, william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com> wrote:
> this draft actively destroys trust in the DNS, which reduces trust in the Internet overall.  
> is that really what you want out of the IETF?

Why would we trust unsigned data from the DNS?   If we did, why would that be a good thing?