IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

"DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com> Wed, 07 April 2010 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <BD2985@att.com>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462553A688F for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kXn6jJxt28NX for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail129.messagelabs.com (mail129.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7024A3A6852 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: BD2985@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-129.messagelabs.com!1270670222!40405299!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 25543 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2010 19:57:03 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-8.tower-129.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Apr 2010 19:57:03 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37Jv1Cw008951; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:57:02 -0500
Received: from td03xsmtp006.US.Cingular.Net (td03xspare19-new.us.cingular.net [135.179.64.43] (may be forged)) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37JuuDx008329; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:56:56 -0500
Received: from bd01xsmtp004.US.Cingular.Net ([135.163.18.45]) by td03xsmtp006.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:56:55 -0500
Received: from BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net ([135.214.27.50]) by bd01xsmtp004.US.Cingular.Net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:56:54 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:56:52 -0700
Message-ID: <FDFC6E6B2064844FBEB9045DF1E3FBBC4F8124@BD01MSXMB016.US.Cingular.Net>
In-Reply-To: <C99FF8B7-61F4-4A05-8389-4F90E43F12F4@g11.org.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
thread-index: AcrWi0usG9/KhYhZR3OiTWO1oA9w7wAAJi8Q
References: <20100406111818.284140@gmx.net><BE16D422273834438B43B6F7D730220F0D1A2FDB@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net> <C99FF8B7-61F4-4A05-8389-4F90E43F12F4@g11.org.uk>
From: "DALY, BRIAN K (ATTCINW)" <BD2985@att.com>
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>, "SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)" <DS2225@att.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2010 19:56:54.0338 (UTC) FILETIME=[78C45A20:01CAD68C]
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:57:07 -0000

The second is more than a market decision - it is an interaction with a
regulatory requirement.

Perhaps a better way to phrase is as follows:

"Additionally, ATOCA will not interfere with nor replace solutions
designed to meet regulatory requirements for any authority to citizen
alerting of any access technology."

Brian Daly
AT&T

-----Original Message-----
From: earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:earlywarning-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ken carlberg
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:48 PM
To: SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions


On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:30 AM, SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) wrote:

> "The ATOCA solutions will not adversely affect the ability of any
access
> technology to provide emergency services to the citizens (e.g. 9-1-1
> calls) or to provide communication services to first responders or
other
> authorized emergency services personnel.  Additionally, ATOCA is not
> replacement solution for any authority to citizen alerting supported
by
> any access technology."

given the previous thread on this list, I'm a bit leery of that first
sentence.  But, if it were agreed to add it in, then I would expect the
individuals who make a claim that an ATOCA solution adversely affects
9-1-1 type calls will be required to prove it instead of simply stating
a position.

as for the second sentence, that is out of scope of the IETF.  any
deployment of what is considered an ATOCA solution is a market decision.

-ken

_______________________________________________
earlywarning mailing list
earlywarning@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email