IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions

ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk> Wed, 07 April 2010 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
X-Original-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: earlywarning@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002AE3A688F for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ysIcChrMRFj for <earlywarning@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from portland.eukhost.com (portland.eukhost.com [92.48.97.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB10D3A6852 for <earlywarning@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 12:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c-76-111-69-4.hsd1.va.comcast.net ([76.111.69.4]:59626 helo=[192.168.0.20]) by portland.eukhost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlberg@g11.org.uk>) id 1NzbEQ-0006vn-Se; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:48:10 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <BE16D422273834438B43B6F7D730220F0D1A2FDB@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:48:11 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C99FF8B7-61F4-4A05-8389-4F90E43F12F4@g11.org.uk>
References: <20100406111818.284140@gmx.net> <BE16D422273834438B43B6F7D730220F0D1A2FDB@BD01MSXMB015.US.Cingular.Net>
To: "SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW)" <DS2225@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - portland.eukhost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - g11.org.uk
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, earlywarning@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [earlywarning] Finishing the Charter Text Discussions
X-BeenThere: earlywarning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for Authority-to-Individuals \(Early Warning\) Emergency " <earlywarning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/earlywarning>
List-Post: <mailto:earlywarning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/earlywarning>, <mailto:earlywarning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 19:48:20 -0000

On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:30 AM, SENNETT, DEWAYNE A (ATTCINW) wrote:

> "The ATOCA solutions will not adversely affect the ability of any access
> technology to provide emergency services to the citizens (e.g. 9-1-1
> calls) or to provide communication services to first responders or other
> authorized emergency services personnel.  Additionally, ATOCA is not
> replacement solution for any authority to citizen alerting supported by
> any access technology."

given the previous thread on this list, I'm a bit leery of that first sentence.  But, if it were agreed to add it in, then I would expect the individuals who make a claim that an ATOCA solution adversely affects 9-1-1 type calls will be required to prove it instead of simply stating a position.

as for the second sentence, that is out of scope of the IETF.  any deployment of what is considered an ATOCA solution is a market decision.

-ken

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email