IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)

Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964A81A1AEE; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:01:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.631
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MISSING_MID=0.497] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deoP0dPBQ2Ap; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58B21A1AD6; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 183.213.130.77.rev.sfr.net ([77.130.213.183]:58744 helo=MORFIN-PC.mail.jefsey.com) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1XlcnK-0000Hl-G6; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 04:01:07 -0800
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 13:00:59 +0100
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>, ianaplan@ietf.org
From: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <5458052D.2030806@meetinghouse.net>
References: <20141103183007.GP27751@mx1.yitter.info> <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNEENBCNAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <20141103212831.GF28565@mx1.yitter.info> <5457FBA7.6050908@cisco.com> <20141103222618.GB28757@mx1.yitter.info> <5458052D.2030806@meetinghouse.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: jefsey+jefsey.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/V4lKGpmr8FbfPoX460zz2JJ3kgQ
Cc: "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] control and negotiation (was Re: draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-02 working group last call)
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:01:08 -0000
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20141104120112.24945.60320.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

At 23:43 03/11/2014, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>As far as the USG is concerned, ICANN is a contractor - nothing 
>more, nothing less.

No. This is what ICANN wants you to think.

1) ICANN is the planned successor for DNS Key functions
2) this being said it considers that the NTIA has to relinquish the 
whole IANA contract so it may control the RIRs before Putin builds his WIR.

If it does not it will file a complaint with the FCC showing how it 
embarasses its DNS key function's owner role and create havoc in the 
address space allocation.
jfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email